Literature DB >> 8950128

Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support.

V Swigart1, C Lidz, V Butterworth, R Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of family decision making about life support in the critical care setting.
DESIGN: Descriptive, exploratory.
SETTING: A northeastern United States university-affiliated medical intensive care unit. SAMPLE: Thirty family members of 16 critically ill patients.
RESULTS: Letting go or becoming willing to forgo life support involved three interrelated and complex processes: (1) family members sought out, obtained, and tried to understand information about the critical illness; (2) they reviewed the life story of the patient, seeking meaning in the patient's life and the critical illness; and (3) they struggled to maintain family roles and relationships. For most families, interpersonal and intrapsychic work during each process created a reframing of the issues related to the critical illness: (1) they came to believe that they had done all that could be done and were able then to relinquish the goal of recovery for acceptance of a peaceful death; (2) they reviewed the patients's life, finding some meaning and a sense that, given the situation, the patient would not want to continue on life support, and then they moved toward closure; and (3) they were able to bring about (at least within a small group of the closest family members) a sense of doing the "right thing", and they were able to develop some sense that forgoing life support for the ill relative would not destroy important family relationships. For a few other families this movement toward resolution did not occur, and although family members attempted to deal with the issues of life support, their efforts were fraught with conflict and prolongation of the end-of-life period.
CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the actual experience of family members as they are involved in life-support decision making. Identification of the needs of family members to work through the decision-making experience cognitively, emotionally, and morally is essential to communicating effectively about the ill relative's condition and to providing understanding and support to families involved in life-support decision making in the critical care unit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8950128     DOI: 10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80051-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  16 in total

1.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  In their own time: the family experience during the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  Debra Wiegand
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  A conceptual model of the role of communication in surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Sandra Petronio; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Christianna Purnell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  Robin J Bandy; Paul R Helft; Robert W Bandy; Alexia M Torke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Responding to families' questions about the meaning of physical movements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Analysis of terminal events in 109 successive deaths in a Belgian intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kalina Gajewska; Michele Schroeder; Francoise De Marre; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Communicating with clinicians: the experiences of surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized older adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Sandra Petronio; Christianna E Purnell; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Information needs at the end of life: a content analysis of one person's story.

Authors:  Lynda M Baker
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-01

9.  Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Mark Siegler; Anna Abalos; Rachael M Moloney; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Nurse-led intervention to improve surrogate decision making for patients with advanced critical illness.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Sarah Martin Cua; Roberta Walk; Laura Pollice; Lisa Weissfeld; Seoyeon Hong; C Seth Landefeld; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.