Literature DB >> 8949475

Context in medical education: the informal ethics curriculum.

E M Hundert1, D Douglas-Steele, J Bickel.   

Abstract

As some formal bioethics instruction has become the norm in American medical schools, a trend has emerged toward increased attention to context in both bioethics education and bioethical decision-making. A focus on classical dilemmas and a textbook knowledge of principles is yielding its previous dominance to permit a more detailed examination of ethical behaviour in actual practice in medicine. After documenting and analysing this emerging trend in bioethics education and its parallel in bioethics theory and research, we turn to the context of medical education itself to look beyond formal bioethics instruction to the 'informal curriculum' that is so central to the moral development of medical students and residents. A qualitative research strategy is being used to study the informal curriculum through analysing tape-recorded informal conversations students and residents have with their friends and colleagues at work about issues bearing on their professional development. Data presented are documenting 'the unwritten code' for medical students on a surgical clerkship and the senior residents' informal ways of producing a 'practical ethics of conduct' that shapes understanding of what is good, skilful, and right on that surgical service. How conceptions of appropriate conduct are conveyed, rewarded and sanctioned also reveals how professional demeanour is taught, permitting discussion about what should be retained and what changed. The context in which ethical issues arise enhances understanding of ethical practice in medicine.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8949475     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00847.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  18 in total

Review 1.  Teaching medical ethics: a review of the literature from North American medical schools with emphasis on education.

Authors:  D W Musick
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Bioethics for clinicians: 25. Teaching bioethics in the clinical setting.

Authors:  M F McKneally; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A new program in pain medicine for medical students: integrating core curriculum knowledge with emotional and reflective development.

Authors:  Beth B Murinson; Elizabeth Nenortas; Roberts Sam Mayer; Lina Mezei; Sharon Kozachik; Suzanne Nesbit; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; James N Campbell
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Supporting whistleblowers in academic medicine: training and respecting the courage of professional conscience.

Authors:  T Faunce; S Bolsin; W-P Chan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Barbara Kritt; Shiphra Ginsburg; David T Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technology.

Authors:  S Bolsin; T Faunce; J Oakley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Conflict management: a primer for doctors in training.

Authors:  D C Saltman; N A O'Dea; M R Kidd
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Accounting for context: future directions in bioethics theory and research.

Authors:  D Douglas-Steele; E M Hundert
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1996-06

9.  Hostility During Training: Historical Roots of Primary Care Disparagement.

Authors:  Joanna Veazey Brooks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  The Hidden Curricula of Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlton Lawrence; Tsholofelo Mhlaba; Kearsley A Stewart; Relebohile Moletsane; Bernhard Gaede; Mosa Moshabela
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.