Literature DB >> 8948517

The benefits of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in slowing progressive renal failure: focus on fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy.

M Epstein1.   

Abstract

During the past two decades, major investigative interest has been focused on the determinants of chronic renal disease and interventions to retard the inexorable progression to end-stage renal disease. Recent studies have provided a theoretic framework for anticipating that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and possibly calcium antagonists, may preferentially retard the progression of renal disease. Whereas the majority of available clinical trials have assessed the effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), there are relatively few long-term studies that have evaluated the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in patients with nondiabetic renal disease. Although clinical trials have been initiated using both of these drug classes as monotherapy, theoretical considerations suggest that fixed-dose combinations of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist might be appealing as renal protective agents. Several lines of evidence suggest that the renal microcirculatory effects of coadministration of both agents should be complementary. Similarly, recent observations suggest that the two classes may act in a complementary manner to countervail pathogenetic mechanisms at the level of the mesangium. A recent study in type II diabetic patients demonstrated that combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist induced the greatest reduction in proteinuria, and reduced the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more than did either agent alone at the same level of blood pressure reduction. Based on such considerations, recent randomized prospective studies have been initiated to compare the renal protective effects of combination calcium antagonist-ACE inhibitor therapy versus monotherapy with agents of either of these two antihypertensive classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8948517     DOI: 10.3109/08860229609047709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for the use of a fixed-dose combination in the management of hypertension: efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine/enalapril.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Arrigo F G Cicero
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Fixed-dose combination therapy: panacea or poison?

Authors:  R B Rao; L R Goldfrank
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: the cycle repeats.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.

Authors:  A Salvetti; P Mattei; I Sudano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Richard B R Muijsers; Monique P Curran; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  A A Taylor; S Sunthornyothin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.