Literature DB >> 20923243

Rationale for the use of a fixed-dose combination in the management of hypertension: efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine/enalapril.

Claudio Borghi1, Arrigo F G Cicero.   

Abstract

Hypertension, a significant factor in the development of cerebrovascular disorders, heart disease and renal failure, is a common disorder worldwide. Despite the availability of a wide range of antihypertensive agents, almost two-thirds of hypertensive patients have poorly controlled blood pressure (BP). Numerous clinical trials have shown that most patients require at least two antihypertensive agents to achieve adequate BP control and associated significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Combination therapy using two drugs with different, complementary mechanisms of action achieves better efficacy and tolerability outcomes than treatment with either component drug alone. When such a combination is administered as a fixed-dose formulation, other benefits, such as improved compliance and potentially lower costs, are also likely. The good efficacy and tolerability of the combination of a calcium channel antagonist and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor is well established, and this combination is recommended by European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines as a first choice in high-risk hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lercanidipine/enalapril is a promising example of a fixed-dose combination of these drug classes. In clinical trials in hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes, lercanidipine/enalapril improved BP to a greater extent than either drug as monotherapy (in patients who were previous non-responders to lercanidipine or enalapril) or the combination of lercanidipine/hydrochlorothiazide, and was equally well tolerated. Further studies are required to evaluate the cardiovascular protective effects of lercanidipine/enalapril.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923243     DOI: 10.1007/bf03256912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  91 in total

1.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ACCOMPLISH trial findings: combination benazepril-amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide is effective for treating hypertension. Commentary.

Authors:  Alan B Weder
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  A A Taylor; S Sunthornyothin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Converting-enzyme inhibition buffers the counter-regulatory response to acute administration of nicardipine.

Authors:  M Bellet; P Sassano; T Guyenne; P Corvol; J Menard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Lercanidipine in type II diabetic patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Giorgio L Viviani
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Hans-Werner Hense; Michel Joffres; Mika Kastarinen; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Diego Vanuzzo; Fenicia Vescio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Renin-angiotensin system blockade and cardiovascular and renal protection.

Authors:  Byron J Hoogwerf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  High doses of lercanidipine are better tolerated than other dihydropyridines in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: results from the TOLERANCE study.

Authors:  V Barrios; C Escobar; M de la Figuera; J Honorato; J L Llisterri; J Segura; A Calderón
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of lercanidipine plus hydrochlorothiazide vs. lercanidipine plus enalapril on micro and macrocirculation in patients with mild essential hypertension.

Authors:  Carolina De Ciuceis; Massimo Salvetti; Anna Paini; Claudia Rossini; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Sarah Duse; Stefano Caletti; Maria Antonietta Coschignano; Francesco Semeraro; Valentina Trapletti; Fabio Bertacchini; Valeria Brami; Alina Petelca; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Damiano Rizzoni; Claudia Agabiti Rosei
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Modern clinical management of arterial hypertension: fixed or free combination therapies?

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2011-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.