Literature DB >> 8947705

A comparison of three techniques for rapid model development: an application in patient risk-stratification.

E L Eisenstein1, F Alemi.   

Abstract

Accurately risk-stratifying patients is a key component of health care outcomes assessment. And, many health care organizations increasingly are relying upon automated means for assistance in making patient risk-stratification decisions. Unfortunately, the process of outcome model development, as it is currently practiced, is both time consuming and difficult. We investigated the relative abilities of three modeling techniques (logistic regression, artificial neural network (ANN), and Bayesian) to rapidly develop models for risk-stratifying patients. Our results demonstrated that all three modeling techniques perform equally well in certain situations. However, the Bayesian model with conditional independence had the best overall performance. Unfortunately, none of the models were able to achieve the degree of accuracy which would be required in a medical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8947705      PMCID: PMC2233190     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp        ISSN: 1091-8280


  8 in total

1.  Bayesian analysis versus discriminant function analysis: their relative utility in the diagnosis of coronary disease.

Authors:  R Detrano; J Leatherman; E E Salcedo; J Yiannikas; G Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Self-learning for a Bayesian knowledge base: how long does it take for the machine to educate itself?

Authors:  T Chard
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Predicting in-hospital survival of myocardial infarction. A comparative study of various severity measures.

Authors:  F Alemi; J Rice; R Hankins
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Artificial intelligence versus logistic regression statistical modelling to predict cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  J Lette; B W Colletti; M Cerino; D McNamara; M C Eybalin; A Levasseur; S Nattel
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  A neural network trained to identify the presence of myocardial infarction bases some decisions on clinical associations that differ from accepted clinical teaching.

Authors:  W G Baxt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admissions to the coronary care unit.

Authors:  M W Pozen; R B D'Agostino; J B Mitchell; D M Rosenfeld; J T Guglielmino; M L Schwartz; N Teebagy; J M Valentine; W B Hood
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.