Literature DB >> 8947576

Pressure effects on the structure of oligomeric proteins prior to subunit dissociation.

P Cioni1, G B Strambini.   

Abstract

In studies of pressure-induced subunit dissociation of protein aggregates, now widely used to evaluate the association free energy, entropy and enthalpy of very stable complexes, it is assumed that high pressure does not influence their structure/thermodynamic parameters and that some peculiarities of these equilibria, such as the decrease in subunit affinity at larger degrees of dissociation (alpha) and hysteresis in alpha/pressure diagrams are imputable to the slow conformational drift of isolated subunits. To test this premise, the conformation of dimeric alcohol dehydrogenase from horse liver and alkaline phosphatase from Escherichia coli was monitored as a function of pressure (up to 3 kbar) and temperature (0 to 50 degrees C) by means of the intrinsic Trp fluorescence and phosphorescence emission and binding of the 1-anilinonaphatalene-8-sulphonic acid (ANS) fluorophore. The results show a distinct influence of high pressure on the native dimers whose changes in conformation may, depending on whether or not these alterations are promptly reversed, be distinguished in elastic and inelastic changes. Elastic changes are ubiquitous and refer to pronounced modulations of the phosphorescence lifetime which is a monitor of the internal flexibility of the macromolecules. They attest to a tightening of the globular structure in the lower pressure range (below 1.5 kbar) as opposed to an increased fluidity in the higher range. The trend is similar between the two proteins and the tightening/loosening effect is fully consistent with the role that internal cavities and hydration of polypeptide is expected to play in determining the compressibility of these biopolymers. Inelastic perturbations reveal a more profound loosening of the globular fold and were observed only with alcohol dehydrogenase under conditions (low temperature (t < 10 degrees C) and high pressure (p > 2.5 kbar)) that favour protein hydration. They involve slow consecutive reactions that produce drastic reductions in phosphorescence lifetime, spectral red shifts, quenching of fluorescence and phosphorescence emission and modulation of ANS binding. Judging from the full protection afforded by glycerol as cosolvent, or the remarkable enhancement caused by modest concentrations of urea, the driving force of these perturbations appears to be pressure-induced hydration of the protein. Inelastic conformational changes are accompanied by a slow and often incomplete recovery of enzymatic activity. The characteristic times of these processes, their pressure dependence and the slow, thermally activated, reversibility are discussed in the light of hysteresis phenomena and changes of subunit affinity in dissociation equilibria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8947576     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  Pressure-induced thermostabilization of glutamate dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus.

Authors:  M M Sun; N Tolliday; C Vetriani; F T Robb; D S Clark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Chaperone-like activity of alpha-crystallin is enhanced by high-pressure treatment.

Authors:  Csaba Böde; Ferenc G Tölgyesi; László Smeller; Karel Heremans; Sergiy V Avilov; Judit Fidy
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Effects of cavity-forming mutations on the internal dynamics of azurin.

Authors:  Patrizia Cioni; Ellen de Waal; Gerard W Canters; Giovanni B Strambini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The pressure dependence of hydrophobic interactions is consistent with the observed pressure denaturation of proteins.

Authors:  G Hummer; S Garde; A E García; M E Paulaitis; L R Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pressure response of protein backbone structure. Pressure-induced amide 15N chemical shifts in BPTI.

Authors:  K Akasaka; H Li; H Yamada; R Li; T Thoresen; C K Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Effects of sucrose on the internal dynamics of azurin.

Authors:  Patrizia Cioni; Emilia Bramanti; Giovanni B Strambini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Contribution of aromatic-aromatic interactions to the anomalous pK(a) of tyrosine-9 and the C-terminal dynamics of glutathione S-transferase A1-1.

Authors:  C Ibarra; B S Nieslanik; W M Atkins
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Tyrosine quenching of tryptophan phosphorescence in glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus.

Authors:  G B Strambini; E Gabellieri; M Gonnelli; S Rahuel-Clermont; G Branlant
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Activation parameters for the spontaneous and pressure-induced phases of the dissociation of single-ring GroEL (SR1) chaperonin.

Authors:  Markandeswar Panda; Paul M Horowitz
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Pressure dissociation of integration host factor-DNA complexes reveals flexibility-dependent structural variation at the protein-DNA interface.

Authors:  Donald F Senear; Vira Tretyachenko-Ladokhina; Michael L Opel; Kimberly A Aeling; G Wesley Hatfield; Laurie M Franklin; Reuben C Darlington; J B Alexander Ross
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.