Literature DB >> 8943988

"Medical effectiveness" in Canadian and U.S. health policy: the comparative politics of inferential ambiguity.

S J Tanenbaum1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare Canadian and U.S. policymaking to determine how different health care systems may use health services research differently in responding to the common problem of ineffective medical care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The United States and Canada are making surprisingly divergent responses to the problem of medical ineffectiveness: reinforcement of the solidarity principle and deprivatization in Canada, and reinforcement of market competition and privatization in the United States. In doing so, Canadian policymakers overstate the societal applicability and U.S. policymakers the individual applicability of outcomes research findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic findings of medical effectiveness are fundamentally ambiguous as they relate to action. They therefore invite divergent policy responses from different policy regimes. Health services researchers must not imagine that research findings are sufficient to determine the course of health policy.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943988      PMCID: PMC1070139     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  25 in total

1.  Political evolution of federal health care regulation.

Authors:  L D Brown
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Health care in Canada: a system in turmoil.

Authors:  T Rathwell
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1994-01-31       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Retailing research: increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth.

Authors:  J Lomas
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  The health care bureaucracy: small changes, big consequences.

Authors:  J A Morone
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

5.  Health care policy implications of the 1994 congressional elections.

Authors:  R J Blendon; D E Altman; J Benson; M Brodie; M James; G Chervinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evidence-based medicine: why all the fuss?

Authors:  F Davidoff; K Case; P W Fried
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  C D Naylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

9.  Knowing and acting in medical practice: the epistemological politics of outcomes research.

Authors:  S J Tanenbaum
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 10.  United States and Canadian approaches to justice in health care: a comparative analysis of health care systems and values.

Authors:  N S Jecker; E M Meslin
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1994-06
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  New concepts in screening.

Authors:  J A Muir Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Getting research findings into practice. When to act on the evidence.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; G H Guyatt; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.