Literature DB >> 8942314

Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: an S-R compatibility study.

E J Stoffels1.   

Abstract

Stimulus-response (S-R) pairs are usually processed faster when-they are presented in a series that consists entirely of compatible relations rather than incompatible relations. A mixture of the two pairs in a series, which induces uncertainty, increases processing speed for both pairs, but more so for compatible S-R pairs. The results of three choice reaction time (RT) tasks showed that presentation of a precue that only indicated either compatible or incompatible S-R pairs reduced the detrimental effect of mixing pairs more for the former than for the latter pairs. A similar asymmetric reduction was observed in the third experiment when either pair was preceded by the same pair or the same class of pairing. Analyses of RT bins revealed that decreases in RT for the mixed compatible S-R pairs occurred only for the faster responses. It was shown further that errors consisted primarily of a correct application of an incorrect S-R transformation rule. The results are interpreted within the framework of the dimensional overlap model of Kornblum et al. (1990) suggesting two sources of the S-R compatibility effect; interference of primed responses and the need to suppress response priming.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942314     DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00063-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  14 in total

1.  Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Working-memory load decreases mappings effects in spatial-compatibility tasks.

Authors:  Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-12-24

5.  Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.

Authors:  Gamze Alpay; Monique Goerke; Birgit Stürmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

6.  Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Sandro Rubichi; Elena Gherri; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

7.  Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings.

Authors:  Lenore E Read; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

8.  Neural systems for preparatory control of imitation.

Authors:  Katy A Cross; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance.

Authors:  Katy A Cross; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.