Literature DB >> 19966265

Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings.

Lenore E Read1, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

For tasks with an incompatible stimulus-response mapping, whether the compatible response must be inhibited is an ongoing issue. Read and Proctor (2004) tested this inhibition hypothesis, using a negative priming paradigm for four-choice tasks with three different incompatible spatial mappings. For a mapping that did not follow a simple rule, reaction time was lengthened when the corresponding response on the preceding trial became the required response on the current trial, as compared with when it did not, showing a negative priming effect. However, for mappings that followed a simple rule, negative priming was not evident. The present study extends this research to a more complex mapping. On the basis of a two-process model adopted from the negative priming literature, we hypothesized that high mapping complexity should also diminish the negative priming effect for incompatible mappings, because the balance of cognitive resources is allocated to identification of the correct response. Two experiments are reported in which mappings of different complexity were used in six-choice spatial tasks. Analyses of reaction times showed that negative priming diminished with increased mapping complexity, apparently due to increased dominance of response identification processes, rather than inhibition of the corresponding response.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966265     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: influences of location mapping on the Simon effect.

Authors:  J G Marble; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Aging and repetition effects: separate specific and nonspecific influences.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Bruce Milliken; Sarah Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-12

3.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.

Authors:  W T Neill; L A Valdes; K M Terry; D S Gorfein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Negate priming and multiple repetition: a reply to Grison and Strayer (2001).

Authors:  W Trammell Neill; Steve Joordens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

5.  Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming.

Authors:  Hsuan-Fu Chao; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-01-06

6.  Negative priming and stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  L P Shiu; S Kornblum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

7.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

Review 8.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: an S-R compatibility study.

Authors:  E J Stoffels
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-11

10.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.