Literature DB >> 8935769

Validity and reliability of the family inventory of needs (FIN): measuring the care needs of families of advanced cancer patients.

L J Kristjanson1, J Atwood, L F Degner.   

Abstract

Two studies balanced qualitative and quantitative data to provide evidence of satisfactory validity and reliability of the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN). The FIN is designed to measure the importance of care needs of families of advanced cancer patients (FIN-Importance of Care Needs subscale) and the extent to which families perceive that their care needs have been met (FIN-Fulfillment of Care Needs subscale). The first study involved development of the instrument and testing for clarity, apparent internal consistency (non-quantitative assessment of homogeneity of content), and content validity using a panel of six experts (family members of advanced cancer patients). The FIN met or exceeded the preset criteria specified used in this phase of testing. The second study of the project used 109 family members of advanced cancer patients from three hospice programs to test the FIN for internal consistency and construct validity. Internal consistency of the FIN-Importance of Care Needs subscale as measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .83 without redundancy. Construct analysis was assessed using factor analysis techniques. An inability to extract a substantively meaningful minimum number of factors, together with the fact that a theta reliability coefficient of .85 was obtained (only .02 higher than the alpha coefficient), suggested that the items were parallel supporting the conclusion that the subscale is unidimensional. Support for the construct validity of the FIN-Importance of Care Needs subscale was also obtained using predictive modeling. The internal structure of the FIN-Fulfillment of Care Needs subscale was assessed using cluster analysis. Results suggested that the subscale is a unidimensional one. Overall, the FIN met the preset reliability and validity criteria providing promising evidence for the instrument's sound psychometric properties for use in research and clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8935769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Meas        ISSN: 1061-3749


  22 in total

Review 1.  Parental bereavement needs in the pediatric intensive care unit: review of available measures.

Authors:  Kathleen L Meert; Stephanie Myers Schim; Sherylyn H Briller
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Improving information to caregivers of cancer patients: the Herlev Hospital Empowerment of Relatives through More and Earlier information Supply (HERMES) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Line Lund; Lone Ross; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Lisa Sengelov; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Caregivers' participation in the oncology clinic visit mediates the relationship between their information competence and their need fulfillment and clinic visit satisfaction.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Ming-Yuan Chih; David H Gustafson; Susan Dinauer; James F Cleary
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-28

4.  Developing supportive care for family members of people with lung cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alison Richardson; Hilary Plant; Sally Moore; Jibby Medina; Amanda Cornwall; Emma Ream
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Needs of caregivers of cancer patients: validation of the Mexican version of the Support Person Unmet Needs Survey (SPUNS-SFM).

Authors:  Svetlana V Doubova; Rebeca Aguirre-Hernandez; Claudia Infante-Castañeda; Ingrid Martinez-Vega; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The stroke caregiver unmet resource needs scale: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  Rosemarie B King; Robert J Hartke; Jungwha Lee; Jason Raad
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.230

7.  Psychosocial adjustment of family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Stephanie Ross; Catherine E Mosher; Victor Ronis-Tobin; Sandy Hermele; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Relationship quality and burden among caregivers for late-stage cancer patients.

Authors:  Linda E Francis; Julie Worthington; Georgios Kypriotakis; Julia H Rose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Stephen J Zyzanski; Julia Hannum Rose; Amy Y Zhang
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE Scale.

Authors:  Gerd Inger Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.