Literature DB >> 8935598

Enteral nutrition and the critically ill.

S A Shikora1, A M Ogawa.   

Abstract

Critically ill patients invariably require nutritional intervention. Traditionally, enteral nutrition has not been widely employed in this patient population. This is due in part to the success of present-day parenteral nutrition, and to difficulties encountered with enteral feeding. Recent evidence has demonstrated that enteral is preferable to parenteral nutrition in terms of cost, complications, gut mucosal maintenance, and metabolic and immune function. Enterally administered nutritional support can and should be utilised as the preferred route of nourishment for the critically ill. The appropriate choice of access and formula, as well as a rational strategy for implementation, should improve the likelihood of success. This article describes the unique features of critical illness as they pertain to nutritional support, the benefits of enteral nutrition, and the obstacles to success, and offers suggestions which may improve the ability to provide nutrients adequately via the intestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935598      PMCID: PMC2398520          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.72.849.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  47 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic response to sepsis and trauma.

Authors:  R G Douglas; J H Shaw
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Do patients with moderately impaired gastrointestinal function requiring enteral nutrition need a predigested nitrogen source? A prospective crossover controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  R G Rees; W R Hare; G K Grimble; P G Frost; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Edgar J. Poth lecture. The surgeon and gut maintenance.

Authors:  C P Page
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Effects of injury, disease, and malnutrition on protein metabolism in man. Unanswered questions.

Authors:  M J Rennie; R Harrison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Risk of pulmonary aspiration among patients receiving enteral nutrition support.

Authors:  H Mullan; R A Roubenoff; R Roubenoff
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The benefits of early jejunal hyperalimentation in the head-injured patient.

Authors:  T W Grahm; D B Zadrozny; T Harrington
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Early enteral feeding does not attenuate metabolic response after blunt trauma.

Authors:  S D Eyer; L T Micon; F N Konstantinides; D A Edlund; K A Rooney; M G Luxenberg; F B Cerra
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-05

Review 8.  Multiple organ failure. Pathophysiology and potential future therapy.

Authors:  E A Deitch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Branched chains support postoperative protein synthesis.

Authors:  F B Cerra; D Upson; R Angelico; C Wiles; J Lyons; L Faulkenbach; J Paysinger
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Comparison of weighted vs unweighted enteral feeding tubes for efficacy of transpyloric intubation.

Authors:  L M Lord; A Weiser-Maimone; M Pulhamus; H C Sax
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Re-examining chemically defined liquid diets through the lens of the microbiome.

Authors:  Tiffany Toni; John Alverdy; Victoria Gershuni
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Endoscopic identification of the jejunum facilitates minimally invasive jejunostomy tube insertion in selected cases.

Authors:  Niazy M Selim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Understanding gastrointestinal perfusion in critical care: so near, and yet so far.

Authors:  G Ackland; M P Grocott; M G Mythen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Alternative method for jejunostomy in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Liqun Gong; Bo Yan; Yulong Chen; Meng Wang; Qiang Zhang; Chen Hui; Changli Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.