Literature DB >> 8934479

Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty.

H B Kitaoka1, G L Patzer.   

Abstract

Two hundred and four primary Mayo total ankle arthroplasties were performed in 179 patients at the Mayo Clinic from 1974 through 1988. We evaluated the clinical result after 160 arthroplasties in 143 patients who had been followed for two years or more (mean, nine years; range, two to seventeen years). The result was good for thirty-one ankles (19 per cent), fair for fifty-five (34 per cent), and poor for seventeen (11 per cent); fifty-seven arthroplasties (36 per cent) were considered to be a failure (defined as removal of the implant). Adequate preoperative and follow-up radiographs were available for 101 ankles (eighty-nine patients). There was radiographic evidence of loosening of eight tibial components (8 per cent) and fifty-eight talar components (57 per cent), but we found no association between the clinical and radiographic results. Complications occurred after nineteen (12 per cent) of the 160 arthroplasties, and ninety-four additional reoperations were necessary after sixty-six (41 per cent). On the basis of these findings, we do not recommend ankle arthroplasty with a constrained Mayo implant for rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthrosis of the ankle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934479     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Dynamic simulation of the natural and replaced human ankle joint.

Authors:  A Leardini; D Moschella
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Forty-year outcome of ankle "cup" arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis.

Authors:  Dawson C Muir; Annunziato Amendola; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Total ankle replacement: why, when and how?

Authors:  Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Federico Dettoni; John E Femino; Phinit Phisitkul; Margherita Germano; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  High revision and reoperation rates using the Agility™ Total Ankle System.

Authors:  Braden J Criswell; Keith Douglas; Rishi Naik; A Brian Thomson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Three-dimensional analysis of the foot following implantation of a HINTEGRA ankle prosthesis: evaluation with the Heidelberg foot model].

Authors:  S Müller; S Wolf; L Döderlein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Tensile engagement of the peri-ankle ligaments in stance phase.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Annunziato Amendola; Thomas D Brown; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Outcome after total ankle arthroplasty-results and findings from worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Svilen Todorov; Liviu Iovanescu; Christian Ioan Stoica; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Complications and results of the arthrodesis after total ankle arthroplasty failure: a retrospective monocentric study of 12 cases.

Authors:  F Egrise; J Parot; C Bauer; F Galliot; M Kirsch; D Mainard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-28

9.  The International Documentation and Evaluation System IDES: a single center observational case series for development of an ankle prosthesis documentation questionnaire and study of its feasibility and face validity.

Authors:  Peter Diel; Christoph Thier; Emin Aghayev; Markus Preis; Marcel Dudda; Norman Espinosa; Christoph Röder
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  [Short-term results after STAR total ankle replacement].

Authors:  R Schönherr; S Fuss; M Körbl; C T Trepte; D Parsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.