Literature DB >> 16390641

Tensile engagement of the peri-ankle ligaments in stance phase.

Yuki Tochigi1, M James Rudert, Annunziato Amendola, Thomas D Brown, Charles L Saltzman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of reconstructive operative procedures to restore normal ankle kinematics after injury requires an understanding of the biomechanics of the ankle during gait. The contribution of the peri-ankle ligaments to ankle motion control is not yet well understood. Knowledge of the tensile engagement of the peri-ankle ligaments during stance phase is necessary to achieve physiologic motion patterns.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver ankles were subjected to a dynamic loading sequence simulating the stance phase of normal level gait. Simultaneously, ligament strain was continuously monitored in the anterior talofibular, calcaneofibular, and posterior talofibular ligaments, as well as in the anterior, middle, and posterior superficial deltoid ligaments. Eight of these specimens underwent further quasi-static range-of-motion testing, where ligament tension recruitment was assessed at 30 degrees plantarflexion and 30 degrees dorsiflexion.
RESULTS: In the dynamic loading tests, none of the ligaments monitored showed a reproducible strain pattern indicating a role in ankle stabilization. However, in the extended range-of-motion tests, most ligaments were taut in plantarflexion or dorsiflexion.
CONCLUSIONS: A consistent combination of individual ligament strain patterns that principally control ankle motion was not identified; none of the ligaments studied were reproducibly recruited to be a primary stabilizing structure. The peri-ankle ligaments are likely to be secondary restraining structures that serve to resist motion to avoid extreme positions. Stance phase ankle motion appears to be primarily controlled by articular congruity, not by peri-ankle ligament tension.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16390641      PMCID: PMC2268960          DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  26 in total

Review 1.  The role of the passive structures in the mobility and stability of the human ankle joint: a literature review.

Authors:  A Leardini; J J O'Connor; F Catani; S Giannini
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Mechanical response of ankle ligaments at low loads.

Authors:  Adam M Butler; William R Walsh
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 3: Talar movement.

Authors:  Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann; Benno M Nigg; Darren Stefanyshyn; Pro Stergiou
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Simultaneous strain measurement with determination of a zero strain reference for the medial and lateral ligaments of the ankle.

Authors:  Satoru Ozeki; Kazunori Yasuda; Kiyoshi Kaneda; Kenichi Yamakoshi; Takahiro Yamanoi
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Kinesiology and mechanical anatomy of the tarsal joints.

Authors:  P W Lapidus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Measurement of mechanical properties of ligament substance from a bone-ligament-bone preparation.

Authors:  S L Woo; M A Gomez; Y Seguchi; C M Endo; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients.

Authors:  Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann; Walter Dick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Ten-year evaluation of cementless Buechel-Pappas meniscal bearing total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Frederick F Buechel; Frederick F Buechel; Michael J Pappas
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles.

Authors:  Thomas Anderson; Fredrik Montgomery; Ake Carlsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 2: Movement transfer.

Authors:  Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann; Benno M Nigg; Darren Stefanyshyn; Pro Stergiou
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; Wendy Li; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effect of implantation accuracy on ankle contact mechanics with a metallic focal resurfacing implant.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Tanawat Vaseenon; Thomas D Brown; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Correlation of dynamic cartilage contact stress aberrations with severity of instability in ankle incongruity.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Todd O McKinley; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Intra-articular contact stress distributions at the ankle throughout stance phase-patient-specific finite element analysis as a metric of degeneration propensity.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; Kiran Shivanna; Nicole M Grosland; Douglas R Pedersen; Thaddeus P Thomas; Yuki Tochigi; J Lawrence Marsh; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2006-03-07

6.  Treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement.

Authors:  N Espinosa; G Klammer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  A Patient-Specific Foot Model for the Estimate of Ankle Joint Forces in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Claudia Mazzà; Roberto Di Marco; Iain Hannah; Clara Malattia; Silvia Magni-Manzoni; Maurizio Petrarca; Anna B Ronchetti; Laura Tanturri de Horatio; E H Pieter van Dijkhuizen; Stefan Wesarg; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Strain pattern of each ligamentous band of the superficial deltoid ligament: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Masato Takao; Satoru Ozeki; Xavier M Oliva; Ryota Inokuchi; Takayuki Yamazaki; Yoshitaka Takeuchi; Maya Kubo; Danielle Lowe; Kentaro Matsui; Mai Katakura; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  An extended discrete element method for the estimation of contact pressure at the ankle joint during stance phase.

Authors:  Ivan Benemerito; Luca Modenese; Erica Montefiori; Claudia Mazzà; Marco Viceconti; Damien Lacroix; Lingzhong Guo
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Impact of Early Weightbearing After Ankle Arthroscopy and Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

Authors:  Richard M Danilkowicz; Nathan L Grimm; Gloria X Zhang; Thomas A Lefebvre; Brian Lau; Samuel B Adams; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.