Literature DB >> 8152358

Meta-analysis of failure-time data with adjustment for covariates.

M G Hunink1, J B Wong.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to present and illustrate a technique for combining failure-time data from various sources, adjusting for differences in case-mix among studies. Based on the proportional-hazards model and the actuarial life-table approach, the method used assumes that the variation across studies is in part due to heterogeneity of the case-mix and adjusts for the case-mix before pooling results. As an example, the technique is applied to life-table data from six selected papers reporting patency of affected arteries following femoropopliteal angioplasty. Published 4- and 5-year patency results ranged from 25% to 58%, with a pooled five-year cumulative patency rate (without adjustment for case-mix) of 45% (+/- 2%). The populations in these studies, however, differed markedly in the prevalence of factors with prognostic value: type of lesion and distal runoff vessels. After adjustment for these differences in case-mix, the pooled five-year patency rates ranged from 60% (+/- 2%) for patients with stenotic lesions and good runoff to 24% (+/- 9%) for those with occlusion and poor runoff. The authors conclude that pooling studies without considering the effect of case-mix yields an average result with inappropriately narrow confidence intervals that does not reflect the variability across subgroups. The presented technique provides a method for combining failure-time data, adjusting for case-mix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8152358     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  8 in total

1.  Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

Review 2.  Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology.

Authors:  M G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A Multiresolution Hazard Model for Multicenter Survival Studies: Application to Tamoxifen Treatment in Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Peter Bouman; Xiao-Li Meng; James Dignam; Vanja Dukić
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Authors:  Patricia Guyot; A E Ades; Mario J N M Ouwens; Nicky J Welton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Do statins improve outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Feng Li; Guangyu Liu; Raheleh Roudi; Qi Huang; Marc Swierzy; Mahmoud Ismail; Song Zhao; Jens-Carsten Rueckert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of surgical margin status on the survival outcome after surgical resection of gastric cancer: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Jiang; Zhaolun Cai; Yuan Yin; Chaoyong Shen; Jinming Huang; Yiqiong Yin; Bo Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-HGF/MET pathway agents plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Jiang; Zhaolun Cai; Qin Ma; Chaoyong Shen; Yuan Yin; Xiaonan Yin; Chunyu Liu; Chen Chang; Zhou Zhao; Mingchun Mu; Bo Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Survival in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Jiang; Chunyu Liu; Zhaolun Cai; Chaoyong Shen; Yuan Yin; Xiaonan Yin; Zhou Zhao; Mingchun Mu; Yiqiong Yin; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.