Literature DB >> 8928604

Cost-effective anesthesia: desflurane versus propofol in outpatient surgery.

E M Kurpiers, J Scharine, S L Lovell.   

Abstract

This study compared the costs of desflurane and propofol as maintenance anesthetic agents in outpatient surgery. Recovery time and related drug expenses were included in the cost comparison. Fifty-three ASA physical status I and II patients were randomly assigned to receive a maintenance anesthetic of either desflurane with 50% nitrous oxide or propofol with 50% nitrous oxide. All patients received a propofol induction and were administered narcotics, sedatives, muscle relaxants, reversal agents, and antiemetics as determined necessary by the anesthesia provider. The mean propofol cost was $31.88 +/- 14.44, whereas, the mean desflurane cost was $12.99 +/- 7.61 (P < .05). The mean cost of all medications, anesthetics, and ancillary agents included was $57.97 +/- 20.22 for the propofol group and $34.86 +/- 14.13 for the desflurane group (P < .05). Of the desflurane patients, 41% experienced nausea compared to 12% of the propofol patients (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the recovery times of the two groups. Desflurane was more cost-effective than propofol. Although desflurane patients experienced more nausea, this did not affect their discharge time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8928604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AANA J        ISSN: 0094-6354


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery.

Authors:  E I Eger; P F White; M S Bogetz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Recovery Profile After General Anaesthesia in Paediatric Ambulatory Surgeries: Desflurane Versus Propofol.

Authors:  Aditi Jain; Satinder Gombar; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-11-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.