Literature DB >> 10947300

Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery.

E I Eger1, P F White, M S Bogetz.   

Abstract

Clinical and economic factors that are important to consider when selecting anaesthesia for day-case surgery can differ from those for inpatient anaesthesia. Patients undergoing day-case surgery tend to be healthier and have shorter durations of surgery. They expect less anxiety before surgery, amnesia for the surgical experience, a rapid return to normal (normal mentation with minimal pain and nausea) after surgery, and lower expenses. However, the latter 2 expectations can conflict; older generic drugs have lower acquisition costs but often impose longer recovery times. Longer recovery periods can increase costs by prolonging the time to discharge from labour-intensive areas such as the operating suite or the post-anaesthesia recovery unit. The challenge for today's anaesthetist is to use newer drugs judiciously to minimise their expense without compromising the rate or quality of recovery. Several approaches can secure these aims. Most apply the least anaesthetic needed. 'Least anaesthetic' may mean the particular form of anaesthetic (e.g. local infiltration with monitored anaesthesia care versus a general anaesthetic), or may mean the delivery of the smallest effective dose, perhaps guided by anaesthetic monitors such as end-tidal analysers or the bispectral index. For patients requiring general anaesthesia, a combination of several drugs usually secures the closest approach to the ideal. Drug combinations used usually include a short-acting properative anxiolytic (e.g. midazolam), intravenous propofol (a short-acting potent anxiolytic and amnestic agent) for induction of anaesthesia (and sometimes for maintenance) and primary maintenance of anaesthesia with inhaled nitrous oxide combined with a poorly soluble (low solubility produces rapid recovery; the least soluble is desflurane) potent inhaled anaesthetic delivered at a low inflow rate (to minimise cost). Although old, nitrous oxide is inexpensive and has favourable pharmacokinetic and cardiovascular advantages; however, it is limited in its anaesthetic/amnestic potency, and has the capacity to increase nausea. In children, induction of anaesthesia is often accomplished with sevoflurane rather than desflurane; although sevoflurane is modestly more soluble than desflurane, it is non-pungent whereas desflurane is pungent. Moderate- or short-acting opioids (fentanyl is popular) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (especially ketorolac), or local anaesthetics are added to secure analgesia during and after surgery. Similarly, when needed, moderate- or short-acting muscle relaxants are selected. Before the end of anaesthesia, an intravenous antiemetic may be given. With this drug combination, patients usually awaken within minutes after anaesthesia and can often move themselves to the vehicle for transport to the recovery unit. These combinations of anaesthetics and techniques minimise use of expensive drugs while expediting recovery (again minimising cost) with minimal or no compromise in the quality of recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947300     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200017030-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  142 in total

1.  A comparison of costs and efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol as prophylactic antiemetic therapy for elective outpatient gynecologic procedures.

Authors:  J Tang; M F Watcha; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery.

Authors:  J A Alhashemi; D R Miller; H V O'Brien; K A Hull
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Influence of age on awakening concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane.

Authors:  T Katoh; Y Suguro; T Ikeda; T Kazama; K Ikeda
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Vital capacity rapid inhalation induction technique: comparison of sevoflurane and halothane.

Authors:  M Yurino; H Kimura
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Subanesthetic concentrations of desflurane and isoflurane suppress explicit and implicit learning.

Authors:  C T Gonsowski; B S Chortkoff; E I Eger; H L Bennett; R B Weiskopf
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  [Desflurane and isoflurane. A comparison of recovery and circulatory parameters in surgical interventions].

Authors:  W Wilhelm; M Kuster; B Larsen; R Larsen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Pharmacoeconomics of intravenous regional anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia for outpatient hand surgery.

Authors:  C R Chilvers; A Kinahan; H Vaghadia; P M Merrick
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Inhaled induction and emergence from desflurane anesthesia in the ambulatory surgical patient: the effect of premedication.

Authors:  R E Kelly; G S Hartman; P B Embree; G Sharp; J F Artusio
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  [A case of postoperative hepatic injury after sevoflurane anesthesia].

Authors:  Y Shichinohe; Y Masuda; H Takahashi; M Kotaki; T Omote; M Shichinohe; A Namiki
Journal:  Masui       Date:  1992-11

10.  Anaesthetic induction time for tracheal intubation using sevoflurane or halothane in children.

Authors:  S Inomata; S Yamashita; H Toyooka; Y Yaguchi; M Taguchi; S Sato
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different regimens of anesthesia for day surgery in China.

Authors:  Liang Shen; Yan Luo; Zhijun Lu; Xiang Hu; Wen Ding; Buwei Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  i-gel™ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients.

Authors:  Anjan Das; Saikat Majumdar; Anindya Mukherjee; Tapobrata Mitra; Ratul Kundu; Bimal Kumar Hajra; Dipankar Mukherjee; Bibhukalyani Das
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Rui Sun; Ze-Bing Zheng; Ren Liao; Jin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The Influence of Differences in Solvents and Concentration on the Efficacy of Propofol at Induction of Anesthesia.

Authors:  Yukako Obata; Yushi U Adachi; Katsumi Suzuki; Taiga Itagaki; Hiromi Kato; Maiko Satomoto; Yoshiki Nakajima
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-21

Review 5.  Perioperative respiratory adverse events during ambulatory anesthesia in obese children.

Authors:  Vesna Marjanovic; Ivana Budic; Mladjan Golubovic; Christian Breschan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Comparative evaluation of cost effectiveness and recovery profile between propofol and sevoflurane in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yashpal Singh; Anil P Singh; Gaurav Jain; Ghanshyam Yadav; Dinesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug

7.  Comparison of maintenance, emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and desflurane in pediatric ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Manish B Kotwani; Anila D Malde
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.