Literature DB >> 8924713

Validity of using serological tests for diagnosis of diseases in wild animals.

I A Gardner1, S Hietala, W M Boyce.   

Abstract

Transposition of diagnostic tests used in domestic livestock species to free-ranging and captive wildlife species has two problems. First, most existing tests have not been adequately validated in domestic livestock. Second, assumptions that a serological test will perform identically in wildlife and livestock species may not be correct, due to differences in pathogenic strains and serovars, host serological responses, and exposure to organisms of similar antigenic structure which produce cross-reacting antibodies. Some assays require species-specific reagents/test components which might not be commercially available, and most assays have not been standardized. The authors outline the principles involved in the evaluation of a serological diagnostic test, and provide examples of how knowledge of test sensitivity and specificity can be used to estimate true prevalence, to determine whether a population is infected, and to facilitate management decisions with regard to animal translocations.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8924713     DOI: 10.20506/rst.15.1.926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  13 in total

1.  Statistical evaluation of a commercial Neospora caninum competitive ELISA in the absence of a gold standard: application to wild elk (Cervus elaphus) in Alberta.

Authors:  Mathieu Pruvot; Wendy Hutchins; Karin Orsel
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Unsupervised clustering of wildlife necropsy data for syndromic surveillance.

Authors:  Eva Warns-Petit; Eric Morignat; Marc Artois; Didier Calavas
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Contrasting results of culture-dependent and molecular analyses of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from wood bison.

Authors:  Taya Forde; Jeroen De Buck; Brett Elkin; Susan Kutz; Frank van der Meer; Karin Orsel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The modification and evaluation of an ELISA test for the surveillance of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in wild ruminants.

Authors:  Mathieu Pruvot; Taya L Forde; Jillian Steele; Susan J Kutz; Jeroen De Buck; Frank van der Meer; Karin Orsel
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Assisting differential clinical diagnosis of cattle diseases using smartphone-based technology in low resource settings: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tariku Jibat Beyene; Amanuel Eshetu; Amina Abdu; Etenesh Wondimu; Ashenafi Feyisa Beyi; Takele Beyene Tufa; Sami Ibrahim; Crawford W Revie
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models.

Authors:  Michael A Tabak; Kerri Pedersen; Ryan S Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Infectious disease and the conservation of free-ranging large carnivores.

Authors:  Dennis L Murray; Cynthia A Kapke; James F Evermann; Todd K Fuller
Journal:  Anim Conserv       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Validation of laboratory tests for infectious diseases in wild mammals: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Beibei Jia; Axel Colling; David E Stallknecht; David Blehert; John Bingham; Beate Crossley; Debbie Eagles; Ian A Gardner
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  Serological diagnosis of Leptospirosis in bovine serum samples using a microsphere immunoassay.

Authors:  S J Wynwood; M A Burns; G C Graham; S L Weier; D B McKay; S B Craig
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2016-01-05

10.  Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Karla Moreno-Torres; Barbara Wolfe; William Saville; Rebecca Garabed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.