Literature DB >> 8924617

Gastric carcinogenesis: 2-chloro-4-methylthiobutanoic acid, a novel mutagen in salted, pickled Sanma hiraki fish, or similarly treated methionine.

W Chen1, J H Weisburger, E S Fiala, T E Spratt, S G Carmella, D Chen, S S Hecht.   

Abstract

The customary salting and pickling of fish in high risk gastric cancer regions were modeled to explore the relevant causative chemicals. The fish Sanma hiraki was treated with sodium chloride and sodium nitrite at pH 3. Previously, it had been found that an extract of the treated fish was mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535 without S9 and also that it induced glandular stomach cancer upon gavage to rats. We now demonstrate that the mutagenicity was enhanced by preincubation of the raw meat for several days before salt-nitrite treatment. HPLC techniques showed that three mutagens were present in the fish extract. One of the mutagens was found to be stable over the pH range of 1.0-9.0. This mutagen was purified by silica gel solid phase extraction, followed by a series of reverse phase HPLC steps, and was characterized by low and high resolution MS, NMR, and FT-IR. While N-nitroso compounds were generally believed to be associated with gastric carcinogenesis, it was unexpectedly found that the mutagen has the novel structure 2-chloro-4-methylthiobutanoic acid (CMBA). Based on the structure, it seemed likely that methionine might be the precursor, and this was, indeed, proven. Both salt and nitrite are essential factors for forming this mutagen. The yield of CMBA was linear for chloride concentrations from 0 to 800 mM NaCl. Of 20 amino acids reacted with nitrite and chloride at pH 3, only methionine generated a mutagen for S. typhimurium TA 1535. Tryptophan gave a product mutagenic in S. typhimurium TA 100 and TA 98, but not TA 1535, and in the case of tyrosine, the mutagen was active only for TA 100. These results suggest an important role for salt in gastric carcinogenesis and provide new approaches for exploring the formation of mutagens/carcinogens for specific target organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8924617     DOI: 10.1021/tx9500585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  5 in total

1.  Fish consumption doesn't reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng-Bao Wang; Qing-Xia Fu; Hai-Yan Liu; Rui Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 2.  Fish consumption and risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Yu; Jian Zou; Jie Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Fish consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shengjun Wu; Jie Liang; Lei Zhang; Xia Zhu; Xufeng Liu; Danmin Miao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Renal carcinogenicity of concurrently administered fish meal and sodium nitrite in F344 rats.

Authors:  F Furukawa; A Nishikawa; H Ishiwata; M Takahashi; Y Hayashi; M Hirose
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-02

5.  Association between Habitual Dietary Salt Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Sheng Ge; Xiaohui Feng; Li Shen; Zhanying Wei; Qiankun Zhu; Juan Sun
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.