Literature DB >> 8923202

Protein levels in beef cattle finishing diets: industry application, university research, and systems results.

M L Galyean1.   

Abstract

Consulting nutritionists were surveyed to determine current formulation and management practices for finishing beef cattle. Among the six consultants surveyed, percentage of CP in finishing diets ranged from 12.5 to 14.4%, with urea levels ranging from .5 to 1.5% of DM. Finishing diets were based primarily on highly processed, rapidly fermented grains (steam-flaked and high-moisture grain), with roughage levels ranging from 3 to 11% of DM. All six consultants considered feed bunk management to be a critical factor affecting feed intake and performance; five of the six consultants used aggressive implant programs based on estrogen + trenbolone acetate. Recent university research was reviewed with respect to CP level and source in finishing diets. Finishing cattle managed on aggressive implant programs seem to respond to higher levels of CP better than would be expected from the factorial calculation approach. Moreover, improvements in performance noted in recent research seemed to be more consistent when supplemental CP was derived from ruminally degraded vs undegraded sources. Calculation of protein requirements with a metabolizable protein (MP) system yielded estimates of protein needs by finishing cattle that agreed more closely with current industry practices than did calculation based on the factorial method. The difference between the MP system and the factorial method was primarily a result of accounting for microbial N needs in the MP system. Reasons for production responses to CP levels that are greater than those calculated by the factorial method include increased accretion of protein by rapidly growing, implanted cattle, particularly during the initial phase of the finishing period, alleviation of a microbial N deficiency, and ruminal and systemic effects of ruminally degraded N on acid-base balance of beef cattle fed rapidly fermented, high-grain diets. Reasons for production responses to supplemental CP need further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923202     DOI: 10.2527/1996.74112860x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  The value of protein-rich supplements on the performance of Red Chittagong heifers (Bos indicus) fed urea molasses straw-based diet.

Authors:  S S Islam; M J Khan; A K F H Bhuiyan; M N Islam; S Barua
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Influence of grain processing on acid-base balance in feedlot steers.

Authors:  C Castillo; J Hernández; J Méndez; J Llena; V Pereira; M López-Alonso; J L Benedito
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Effects of wet corn distiller's grains with solubles and nonprotein nitrogen on feeding efficiency, growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient losses of yearling steers12.

Authors:  Christian H Ponce; N Andy Cole; Jason Sawyer; Julio C B da Silva; Douglas R Smith; Casey Maxwell; Mike S Brown
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Energy costs of feeding excess protein from corn-based by-products to finishing cattle.

Authors:  Jenny S Jennings; Beverly E Meyer; Pablo J Guiroy; N Andy Cole
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of increased dietary crude protein levels on production performance, nitrogen utilisation, blood metabolites and ruminal fermentation of Holstein bulls.

Authors:  Chuanqi Xia; Muhammad Aziz Ur Rahman; He Yang; Taoqi Shao; Qinghua Qiu; Huawei Su; Binghai Cao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Effect of Two Nutritional Strategies to Balance Energy and Protein Supply in Fattening Heifers on Performance, Ruminal Metabolism, and Carcass Characteristics.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Arias; Gonzalo Guajardo; Stefan Kunick; Christian Alvarado-Gilis; Juan Pablo Keim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Effects of Decreasing Dietary Crude Protein on the Growth Performance, Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality of Finishing Charolais Bulls.

Authors:  Martina Cortese; Severino Segato; Igino Andrighetto; Nicola Ughelini; Maria Chinello; Eliana Schiavon; Giorgio Marchesini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Slow-Release Urea Supplementation on the Performance of Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Saheed A Salami; Colm A Moran; Helen E Warren; Jules Taylor-Pickard
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  A survey of recommended practices made by veterinary practitioners to cow-calf operations in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G D Fike; J C Simroth; D U Thomson; E F Schwandt; R Spare; A J Tarpoff
Journal:  Prof Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.