Literature DB >> 8923064

Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit.

J S Turner1, W L Michell, C J Morgan, S R Benatar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of limiting (withdrawing and withholding) therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU), the grounds for limiting therapy, the people involved in the decisions, the way the decisions are implemented and the patient outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective survey. Ethical approval was obtained.
SETTING: ICUs in tertiary centres in London and Cape Town. PATIENTS: All patients who died or had life support limited.
INTERVENTIONS: Data collection only.
RESULTS: There were 65 deaths out of 945 ICU discharges in London and 45 deaths out of 354 ICU discharges in Cape Town. Therapy was limited in 81.5% and 86.7% respectively (p = 0.6) of patients who died. The mean ages of patients whose therapy was limited were 60.2 years and 51.9 years (p = 0.014) and mean APACHE II scores 18.5 and 22.6 (p = 0.19) respectively. The most common reason for limiting therapy in both centres was multiple organ failure. Both medical and nursing staff were involved in most decisions, which were only implemented once wide consensus had been reached and the families had accepted the situation. Inotropes, ventilation, blood products, and antibiotics were most commonly withdrawn. The mean time from admission to the decision to limit therapy was 11.2 days in London and 9.6 days in Cape Town. The times to outcome (death in all patients) were 13.2 h and 8.1 h respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of therapy occurred commonly, most often because of multiple organ failure. Wide consensus was reached before a decision was made, and the time to death was generally short.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923064     DOI: 10.1007/bf01699222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions.

Authors:  D Orentlicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Physician decisions regarding life support in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  M L Osborne
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Statement on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  S R Benatar; C Abels; R Abratt; J Anthony; D Benatar; D Brooks; J Degenaar; D Dent; M de Villiers; F du Preez
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1994-05

4.  Prognosis in acute organ-system failure.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use.

Authors:  L L Emanuel; M J Barry; J D Stoeckle; L M Ettelson; E J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study.

Authors:  K Faber-Langendoen; D M Bartels
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Active management of the dying patient.

Authors:  K Daffurn; R Kerridge; K M Hillman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-11-16       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choices.

Authors:  L L Emanuel; E J Emanuel; J D Stoeckle; L R Hummel; M J Barry
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-24

10.  Prognosis in nontraumatic coma.

Authors:  D E Levy; D Bates; J J Caronna; N E Cartlidge; R P Knill-Jones; R H Lapinski; B H Singer; D A Shaw; F Plum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pattern of end-of-life decisions in two Tunisian intensive care units: the role of culture and intensivists' training.

Authors:  Islem Ouanes; Néji Stambouli; Fahmi Dachraoui; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Samir Toumi; Faouzi Ben Salem; Mourad Gahbiche; Fekri Abroug
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  End-of-life decisions in an Indian intensive care unit.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Mani; Amit Kumar Mandal; Sabyasachi Bal; Yash Javeri; Rakesh Kumar; Deepak Kumar Nama; Praveen Pandey; Tara Rawat; Navneet Singh; Hemant Tewari; Rajiv Uttam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Worldwide similarities and differences in the foregoing of life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  C L Sprung; L A Eidelman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  N M Mark; S G Rayner; N J Lee; J R Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.

Authors:  Simon Cohen; Charles Sprung; Peter Sjokvist; Anne Lippert; Bara Ricou; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Paulo Maia; Dermot Phelan; Konrad Reinhart; Karl Werdan; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Tom Woodcock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital.

Authors:  K Street; R Ashcroft; J Henderson; A V Campbell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Attitudes towards ethical problems in critical care medicine: the Chinese perspective.

Authors:  Li Weng; Gavin M Joynt; Anna Lee; Bin Du; Patricia Leung; Jinming Peng; Charles D Gomersall; Xiaoyun Hu; Hui Y Yap
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a Lebanese intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Alexandre Yazigi; Moussa Riachi; Georges Dabbar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Analysis of terminal events in 109 successive deaths in a Belgian intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kalina Gajewska; Michele Schroeder; Francoise De Marre; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Changes in medical students' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions across different years of medical training.

Authors:  Pascale C Gruber; Charles D Gomersall; Gavin M Joynt; Anna Lee; Pui Yin Grace Tang; Adelina Shuan Young; Nga Yui Florrie Yu; Oi Ting Yu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.