Literature DB >> 8918423

Outcomes of anorectal disease in a health maintenance organization setting. The need for colorectal surgeons.

E T Goldstein1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current trend in health delivery is managed care, in which the primary care provider (PCP) manages patient care and triages specialty referrals. It has not been established, however, that PCPs can accurately diagnose, treat, or triage anorectal disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken at a health maintenance organization that hired a colon and rectal surgeon. Charts of the first 100 consecutive consultations for anorectal complaints were analyzed for accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of care.
RESULTS: Correct diagnoses were made by 45 of 85 (53 percent) PCP physicians, 6 of 15 (40 percent) PCP physician assistants, and 8 of 15 (53 percent) general surgeons. A delay to diagnosis or appropriate treatment occurred in 25 patients (25 percent), resulting in an adverse outcome in 15 people. Of these, five complications were caused by delayed diagnosis, and ten patients had symptoms that persisted from 5 months to 14 years (mean, 4.5 years). Seven unnecessary referrals to a gastroenterologist resulted in three unnecessary colonoscopies. Of 19 patients evaluated by a general surgeon, 4 had inadequate/inappropriate operations, 5 were untreated because of misdiagnosis, 3 correctly diagnosed were untreated, 3 had inappropriate follow-up, 1 was referred to a gastroenterologist, and 2 were advised to have appropriate treatment.
SUMMARY: The PCP correctly diagnosed anorectal disorders in 51 percent of cases and referred patients promptly 75 percent of the time. Of the 25 percent with delay, 60 percent experienced a complication of persistent symptoms. Fifteen of 19 (79 percent) patients seen by a general surgeon were inappropriately managed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918423     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer: the need for randomized trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

2.  Prevalence and distribution of anorectal misdiagnoses.

Authors:  W L Hofstetter; P Ly; G Anthone; A E Ortega; P Vukasin; R W Beart
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-06

Review 3.  Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines.

Authors:  Antonio Tarasconi; Gennaro Perrone; Justin Davies; Raul Coimbra; Ernest Moore; Francesco Azzaroli; Hariscine Abongwa; Belinda De Simone; Gaetano Gallo; Giorgio Rossi; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Vanni Agnoletti; Gianluigi de'Angelis; Nicola de'Angelis; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Paolo Carcoforo; Marco Ceresoli; Alain Chichom-Mefire; Salomone Di Saverio; Federica Gaiani; Mario Giuffrida; Andreas Hecker; Kenji Inaba; Michael Kelly; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; Carlos Ordoñez; Vittoria Pattonieri; Andrew Peitzman; Manos Pikoulis; Boris Sakakushev; Massimo Sartelli; Vishal Shelat; Edward Tan; Mario Testini; George Velmahos; Imtiaz Wani; Dieter Weber; Walter Biffl; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Anorectal emergencies.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Colorectal surgeons and biomedical scientists improve lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Shaw; E E Collins; A Fakis; P Patel; D Semeraro; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  [How can we improve the care of patients with benign anorectal diseases?].

Authors:  Jessica Correa; Jose Luis Lopez-Negre; Carmen Barrio; David Parés
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 1.137

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.