Literature DB >> 8917811

Isolating excitatory and inhibitory nonlinear spatial interactions involved in contrast detection.

B Zenger, D Sagi.   

Abstract

Interactions between filters tuned to different orientations and spatial locations were investigated with a masking paradigm. Targets were masked by pairs of Gabor signals presented either at a different orientation (+/- delta theta) or at a different spatial location (+/- delta y). The two mask components were either of equal phase or of opposite phase to each other. Detection thresholds of the target were measured as a function of mask contrast. Typically, the curves obtained showed the following behavior: for increasing mask contrast the threshold first decreased, then reached a minimum and then increased linearly on a log-log scale reflecting a power-law behavior. Mask pairs of equal phase as well as pairs of opposite phase were shown to facilitate detection. Facilitation by mask pairs of equal phase was larger (up to 0.4 log units) and decreased for increasing delta theta and delta y. The facilitation for mask pairs of opposite phase (approximately 0.1 log units) was observed only for larger delta theta and delta y. Phase independent suppression was observed with higher mask contrasts at smaller delta theta and delta y. The strength of this suppression was shown to decrease with practice. We account for the observed facilitation with an accelerating transducer function applied on a second-stage filter. Suppression is modeled with an additional inhibitory second stage filter that divides the output of this transducer. Selective reduction of the inhibitory gain accounts for the practice effects.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917811     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00303-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Tova Ma-Naim; Michael Belkin; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Preeti Verghese; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A perceptual memory for low-contrast visual signals.

Authors:  Y Tanaka; D Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Excitatory-inhibitory network in the visual cortex: psychophysical evidence.

Authors:  Y Adini; D Sagi; M Tsodyks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Multiple forms of contour grouping deficits in schizophrenia: what is the role of spatial frequency?

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Gennady Erlikhman; Sabine Kastner; Danielle Paterno; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Spatio-temporal low-level neural networks account for visual masking.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Anna Sterkin; Oren Yehezkel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.