Literature DB >> 8917756

The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation.

U Leonards1, W Singer, M Fahle.   

Abstract

Scene segmentation and perceptual grouping are important operations in visual processing. Pattern elements constituting individual perceptual objects need to be segregated from those of other objects and the background and have to be bound together for further joint evaluation. Both textural (spatial) and temporal cues are exploited for this grouping operation. Thus, pattern elements might get bound that share certain textural features and/or appear in close spatial or temporal contiguity. However, results on the involvement of temporal cues in perceptual grouping are contradictory [Kiper et al. (1991). Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 1209; Fahle (1993). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 254, 199-203]. We therefore reinvestigated the relative contributions of temporal and spatial cues and their interactions in a texture-segmentation paradigm. Our data show that the visual system can segregate figures solely on the basis of temporal cues if the temporal offset between figure and ground elements exceeds 10 msec. Moreover, segregation of figures defined by orientation differences among pattern elements is facilitated by additional temporal cues if these define the same figure. If temporal and textural cues define different figures, the two cues compete and only the more salient pattern is perceived. By contrast, the detection of a figure defined by orientation is not impaired by conflicting temporal cues if these do not define a figure themselves and do not exceed offset intervals of 100 msec. These results indicate the existence of a flexible binding mechanism that exploits both temporal and textural cues either alone or in combination if they serve perceptual grouping but can exclude either of the two cues if they are in conflict or do not define a figure. It is proposed that this flexibility is achieved by the implementation of two segmentation mechanisms which differ in their sensitivity for spatial and temporal cues and interact in a facultative way.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917756     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)86829-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Perceptual binding of sensory events: the inclusive characteristics model.

Authors:  V Ya Sergin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10

2.  Types of gamma-oscillatory processes in the neuronal structures of the visual system.

Authors:  N F Podvigin; T V Bagaeva; N B Kiseleva; E V Boikova; E Pöppel
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  A common perceptual temporal limit of binding synchronous inputs across different sensory attributes and modalities.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of asynchrony on symmetry perception.

Authors:  Gert van der Vloed; Arpád Csathó; Peter A van der Helm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-09

Review 5.  Neural networks a century after Cajal.

Authors:  Walter J Jermakowicz; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-07-13

6.  Interaction of attention and temporal object priming.

Authors:  Frank Bauer; Marius Usher; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09

7.  Synchronization of visual responses between the cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, and retina in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  M Castelo-Branco; S Neuenschwander; W Singer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations.

Authors:  W Singer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Distinct perceptual grouping pathways revealed by temporal carriers and envelopes.

Authors:  Stéphane Rainville; Aaron Clarke
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The timing of binding and segregation of two compound aftereffects.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Sarah Hancock; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.