Literature DB >> 20335212

A common perceptual temporal limit of binding synchronous inputs across different sensory attributes and modalities.

Waka Fujisaki1, Shin'ya Nishida.   

Abstract

The human brain processes different aspects of the surrounding environment through multiple sensory modalities, and each modality can be subdivided into multiple attribute-specific channels. When the brain rebinds sensory content information ('what') across different channels, temporal coincidence ('when') along with spatial coincidence ('where') provides a critical clue. It however remains unknown whether neural mechanisms for binding synchronous attributes are specific to each attribute combination, or universal and central. In human psychophysical experiments, we examined how combinations of visual, auditory and tactile attributes affect the temporal frequency limit of synchrony-based binding. The results indicated that the upper limits of cross-attribute binding were lower than those of within-attribute binding, and surprisingly similar for any combination of visual, auditory and tactile attributes (2-3 Hz). They are unlikely to be the limits for judging synchrony, since the temporal limit of a cross-attribute synchrony judgement was higher and varied with the modality combination (4-9 Hz). These findings suggest that cross-attribute temporal binding is mediated by a slow central process that combines separately processed 'what' and 'when' properties of a single event. While the synchrony performance reflects temporal bottlenecks existing in 'when' processing, the binding performance reflects the central temporal limit of integrating 'when' and 'what' properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20335212      PMCID: PMC2894908          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  52 in total

1.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Ryota Kanai; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Rapid global form binding with loss of associated colors.

Authors:  Colin W G Clifford; Alex O Holcombe; Joel Pearson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceptual pairing of colour and motion.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions.

Authors:  Clara Bodelón; Mazyar Fallah; John H Reynolds
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Visual binding of English and Chinese word parts is limited to low temporal frequencies.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe; Jeff Judson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 7.  Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion.

Authors:  L Battelli; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator; M J Tramo; M A Hénaff; F Michèl; J J Barton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 10.  The 'when' parietal pathway explored by lesion studies.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Vincent Walsh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  26 in total

1.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural timing signal for precise tactile timing judgments.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

4.  Attention Periodically Binds Visual Features As Single Events Depending on Neural Oscillations Phase-Locked to Action.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Viljami R Salmela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interacting parallel pathways associate sounds with visual identity in auditory cortices.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti Hämäläinen; Stephanie Rossi; Mikko Sams; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Audio-Visual Temporal Recalibration Can be Constrained by Content Cues Regardless of Spatial Overlap.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Takahiro Kawabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-24

9.  Temporal structure in audiovisual sensory selection.

Authors:  Anne Kösem; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of delayed visual feedback on grooved pegboard test performance.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.