Literature DB >> 8917546

Spontaneous mutations recovered as mosaics in the mouse specific-locus test.

L B Russell1, W L Russell.   

Abstract

The specific-locus test (SLT) detects new mutants among mice heterozygous for seven recessive visible markers. Spontaneous mutations can be manifested not only as singleton whole-body mutants in controls (for which we report new data), but as mosaics-either visible (manifesting mottled coat color) in the scored generation (G2) or masked, among the wild-type parental generation (G1). Masked G1 mosaics reveal themselves by producing clusters of whole-body mutants in G2. We provide evidence that most, if not all, mosaics detected in the SLT (both radiation and control progenies) result from a single-strand spontaneous mutation subsequent to the last premeiotic mitosis and before the first postmeiotic one of a parental genome-the "perigametic interval." Such events in the genomes of the G1 and Gzero results, respectively, in visible and masked 50:50 mosaics. Per cell cycle, the spontaneous mutation rate in the perigametic interval is much higher than that in pregamete mitotic divisions. A clearly different locus spectrum further supports the hypothesis of different origin, and casts further doubt on the validity of the doubling-dose risk-estimation method. Because mosaics cannot have arisen in mitotic germ cells, and are not induced by radiation exposure in the perigametic interval, they should not be included in calculations of radiation-induced germ-line mutation rates. For per-generation calculations, inclusion of mosaics yields a spontaneous frequency 1.7 times that calculated from singletons alone for mutations contributed by males; including both sexes, the multiple is 2.2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917546      PMCID: PMC24048          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Melphalan, a second chemical for which specific-locus mutation induction in the mouse is maximum in early spermatids.

Authors:  L B Russell; P R Hunsicker; M D Shelby
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  An augmenting effect of dose fractionation on radiation-induced mutation rate in mice.

Authors:  W L RUSSELL
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1962-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Radiation-Induced Presumed Somatic Mutations in the House Mouse.

Authors:  L B Russell; M H Major
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  X-ray-induced mutations in mice.

Authors:  W L RUSSELL
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1951

5.  Molecular genetic analysis of the dilute-short ear (d-se) region of the mouse.

Authors:  E M Rinchik; L B Russell; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Complementation mapping of skeletal and central nervous system abnormalities in mice of the piebald deletion complex.

Authors:  T P O'Brien; D L Metallinos; H Chen; M K Shin; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  High frequency of mosaic mutants produced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea exposure of mouse zygotes.

Authors:  L B Russell; J W Bangham; K F Stelzner; P R Hunsicker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Analysis of the albino-locus region of the mouse. II. Mosaic mutants.

Authors:  L B Russell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Specific-locus mutation frequencies in mouse stem-cell spermatogonia at very low radiation dose rates.

Authors:  W L Russell; E M Kelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The mouse specific-locus test with agents other than radiations: interpretation of data and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  L B Russell; P B Selby; E von Halle; W Sheridan; L Valcovic
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  32 in total

1.  The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation.

Authors:  D W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex slows down the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the homothallic fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  Judith Bruggeman; Alfons J M Debets; Pieter J Wijngaarden; J Arjan G M deVisser; Rolf F Hoekstra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating mutation rate: how to count mutations?

Authors:  Yun-Xin Fu; Haying Huai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chaos and order in spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  John W Drake
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Direct mutation analysis by high-throughput sequencing: from germline to low-abundant, somatic variants.

Authors:  Michael Gundry; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Comparison of the genetic effects of equimolar doses of ENU and MNU: while the chemicals differ dramatically in their mutagenicity in stem-cell spermatogonia, both elicit very high mutation rates in differentiating spermatogonia.

Authors:  Liane B Russell; Patricia R Hunsicker; William L Russell
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  An Oak Ridge legacy: the specific locus test and its role in mouse mutagenesis.

Authors:  A P Davis; M J Justice
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic studies at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission-Radiation Effects Research Foundation: 1946-1997.

Authors:  J V Neel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Clusters of identical new mutations can account for the "overdispersed" molecular clock.

Authors:  H Huai; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.