Literature DB >> 8911939

Differential influence of the visual framework on end point accuracy and trajectory specification of arm movements.

I Toni1, M Gentilucci, M Jeannerod, J Decety.   

Abstract

In this study the influence of visual scene on both arm end point accuracy and spatial path kinematics was evaluated. Eight subjects, immersed in a virtual environment, were required to point to one of ten targets located at two distances and in five directions. Targets were presented in frameworks of different complexity. The simplest framework was constituted by a uniform background, the most complex framework was constituted by a perspective-arranged grid. In the other two conditions it consisted of lines having a direction parallel to either the subject's sagittal or frontal body axis. Movements were executed without vision of both target and framework. The results showed that pointing movements were hypometric in all conditions. No difference in end point localization was observed between movements executed after presentation of the simplest and the most complex scenes. However, hypometria significantly increased when the scene was formed by lines parallel to the subject's sagittal axis. Visual information on the scene was also used to specify hand path parameters. Trajectory curvature increased with decreasing complexity of the framework. Correspondingly, the pointing kinematics varied. Taken together, these results suggest that visual analysis of cues surrounding the target can influence both target localisation and hand path planning. However, scene complexity is directly related only to determining trajectory curvature. We conclude that planning an arm movement consists of at least two processes: target localisation and hand path specification. Environmental visual cues forming the scene are taken into account differently during the two processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8911939     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Mechanisms for distance reproduction in perceptual and motor tasks.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; A Negrotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.

Authors:  J D Fisk; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements.

Authors:  P Conti; D Beaubaton
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1980-02

9.  Human arm trajectory formation.

Authors:  W Abend; E Bizzi; P Morasso
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Stelmach; M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Jagdeep Kaur Bala
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.