Literature DB >> 8909890

Auditory development reflected by middle latency response.

T McGee1, N Kraus.   

Abstract

The auditory middle latency response (MLR) seems to have a relatively long developmental time course, extending through the first decade of life. Characteristics of each MLR component change developmentally not only with respect to waveform morphology but also with respect to response reliability, dependence on awareness state, and stimulus rate. Both human and animal studies indicate that these complex changes may be a result of multiple generating systems that show multiple time courses of development. This framework has practical ramifications in that clinical and research studies of MLR in young children must take into account the development sequence. Furthermore, it cannot be assumed a priori that research results obtained from adults will apply to young children. The complexity of the process raises intriguing questions regarding the functional development of auditory perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8909890     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199610000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Non-linguistic auditory processing and working memory update in pre-school children who stutter: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Intracranial recording and source localization of auditory brain responses elicited at the 50 ms latency in three children aged from 3 to 16 years.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Eishi Asano; Valentina Gumenyuk; Csaba Juhász; Michael Wagner; Robert D Rothermel; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Differences in postinjury auditory system pathophysiology after mild blast and nonblast acute acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Nicholas Race; Jesyin Lai; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pure-tone auditory threshold in school children.

Authors:  Reinhard Müller; Gerald Fleischer; Joachim Schneider
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Central auditory development: evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anu Sharma; Phillip Gilley; Kathryn Martin; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.

Authors:  Emily X Han; Joseph M Fernandez; Caitlin Swanberg; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  The P1 biomarker for assessing cortical maturation in pediatric hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Hannah Glick; Emily Deeves; Erin Duncan
Journal:  Otorinolaringologia       Date:  2015-12

10.  Evoked Potentials Reveal Noise Exposure-Related Central Auditory Changes Despite Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Christopher E Niemczak; Sean D Kampel; Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.