Literature DB >> 8907815

Sickle cell screening policies as portent: how will the human genome project affect public sector genetic services?

D D Phoenix1, S M Lybrook, R W Trottier, F C Hodgin, L A Crandall.   

Abstract

The Human Genome Project holds much promise for providing dramatic improvements in our understanding of and means to diagnose and treat many diseases. As this enormously important endeavor proceeds, research on ethical, legal, and social implications of this new science is being conducted to forecast problems and recommend policy option solutions to avoid what might otherwise become adverse consequences. Sickle cell screening is an example of a technology that was introduced in a manner that raised poignant issues. On the basis of sickle cell issues, we examined policy issues likely to occur as new genetic technologies are incorporated into medical practice. Discussion and development of a national consensus on the appropriate content and just delivery of public sector genetic services is vital; otherwise, the impact of Human Genome Project-derived technology may result in misadventures that amplify problems currently evident in newborn screening programs. New DNA-based diagnostic technologies and therapies will soon enter the stream of commerce. The recommendations offered here, while based on examination of sickle cell disease policies, are intended to address both current inequities as well as potential future issues related to stigmatization and distributive justice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8907815      PMCID: PMC2607960     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  14 in total

1.  Screening and treatment of newborns.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Houst Law Rev       Date:  1992

2.  The stigma of disease: implications of genetic screening.

Authors:  H Markel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Foreword: the human genome initiative: genetics' lightning rod.

Authors:  J Beckwith
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1991

4.  Georgia's experience with newborn screening: 1981 to 1985.

Authors:  M S Harris; J R Eckman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A national program to restructure local public health agencies in the United States.

Authors:  A N Koplin
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.222

6.  Sickle cell disease in nonblack persons.

Authors:  D R Powars
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening.

Authors:  R Faden; A J Chwalow; N A Holtzman; S D Horn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Gene therapy prospects for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  P R Clemens; C T Caskey
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Recombinant human hemoglobins designed for gene therapy of sickle cell disease.

Authors:  S L McCune; M P Reilly; M J Chomo; T Asakura; T M Townes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Application of molecular genetics in public health: improved follow-up in a neonatal hemoglobinopathy screening program.

Authors:  Y H Zhang; L L McCabe; M Wilborn; B L Therrell; E R McCabe
Journal:  Biochem Med Metab Biol       Date:  1994-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative Human Genome Project: African American response.

Authors:  Fatimah Jackson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research.

Authors:  M W Foster; R R Sharp; W L Freeman; M Chino; D Bernsten; T H Carter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  'All her children are born that way': gendered experiences of stigma in families affected by sickle cell disorder in rural Kenya.

Authors:  Vicki M Marsh; Dorcas M Kamuya; Sassy S Molyneux
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2011 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.