Literature DB >> 8905504

Screening sigmoidoscopy. Factors associated with utilization.

S F Lewis1, N M Jensen.   

Abstract

Although screening sigmoidoscopy (SS) reduces colorectal cancer mortality, surveys indicate that fewer than half of primary care physicians routinely recommend SS and less than 10% of eligible patients receive this test. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers to compliance with SS through a cross-sectional survey of general medicine patients. Clinician advice, perceived benefit of the test, and having a family member who has had the test are associated with SS, while perceived pain is a barrier to compliance and can negate the positive effects of clinician advice. These factors can be targeted as part of efforts to improve compliance with SS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8905504     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  12 in total

1.  Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.

Authors:  V L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

2.  The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  M L Brown; A L Potosky; G B Thompson; L G Kessler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Illness experience and treatment: can we transcend the quantitative/qualitative dichotomy?

Authors:  H F Stein
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Cancer statistics, 1993.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  R B Kelly; J C Shank
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures.

Authors:  R C Burack; J Liang
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

Authors:  N K Janz; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  No association between colorectal cancer worry and screening uptake in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Facilitating factors for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  S Gölder; W Vogt; H Lichti; H C Rath; A Kullmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Improving screening for cancer in the primary care setting. Where do we need to go and how can we get there?

Authors:  D Atkins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Predictors of CT colonography utilization among asymptomatic medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Michael Harhay; Anna Lev-Toaff; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

10.  The impact of consumer-directed health plans and patient socioeconomic status on physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Giridhar Mallya; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.