Literature DB >> 8905420

Infection control practices in intensive care units of 14 European countries. The EURO.NIS Study Group.

M L Moro1, O B Jepsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with recommended patient-care practices for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: European descriptive survey by questionnaire mailed to all the directors of ICUs. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1642 general ICUs with more than three beds in 14 countries were contacted; 1005 units participated in the study (overall response rate of 61.2%). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Data on the general characteristics of the hospital and of the ICU, surveillance activities, and patient-care practices relevant to the control of HAIs were collected. Compliance varied significantly by the type of practice evaluated. Comprehensive programs adopting all the recommended preventive practices for specific infections were maintained in a very low proportion of units, ranging from 18% for antibiotic policy to 39% for urinary tract infections. Moreover, 14% of the units claimed to adopt three or more practices that are clearly unsafe, and only 35% of the units claimed not to adopt any risky practice. The presence of an infection control nurse was significantly associated with a lower frequency of substandard care. A great variability was observed by country in the adoption of 29 patient-care practices, mostly for practices for which clear-cut guidelines are lacking.
CONCLUSION: Interpretation of data is made difficult by the lack of consensus among experts with respect to some of the practices investigated. Nevertheless, the implementation of standard practices for preventing HAIs is far from satisfactory in the hospitals surveyed, even in a high priority hospital area such as intensive care. Documented European guidelines could be worth-while in increasing awareness of the ICU staff. The availability of at least one infection control nurse in each hospital should be strongly advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8905420     DOI: 10.1007/bf02044110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  20 in total

1.  Infection control in intensive care units: U.K. national survey.

Authors:  T J Inglis; L J Sproat; P M Hawkey; P Knappett
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Diffusion and adoption of CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections in US hospitals.

Authors:  D D Celentano; L L Morlock; F E Malitz
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1987-10

3.  CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Supersedes guideline for hospital environmental control published in 1981.

Authors:  J S Garner; M S Favero
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Guidelines for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 5.  Physician utilization. The state of research about physicians' practice patterns.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals.

Authors:  R W Haley; D H Culver; J W White; W M Morgan; T G Emori; V P Munn; T M Hooton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Incidence and risk factors of pneumonia acquired in intensive care units. Results from a multicenter prospective study on 996 patients. European Cooperative Group on Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Authors:  S Chevret; M Hemmer; J Carlet; M Langer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Epidemiology and control of nosocomial infections in adult intensive care units.

Authors:  R A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Surgical wound infection.

Authors:  R L Nichols
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Nosocomial infections in intensive care wards: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  F D Daschner; P Frey; G Wolff; P C Baumann; P Suter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  5 in total

1.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Europe: which infection control measures are taken?

Authors:  S Hansen; F Schwab; A Asensio; H Carsauw; P Heczko; I Klavs; O Lyytikäinen; M Palomar; I Riesenfeld-Orn; A Savey; E Szilagyi; R Valinteliene; J Fabry; P Gastmeier
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Disinfection for prevention and control of infections on the threshold of the 21 century for the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Franz X Lackner
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2007-09-13

3.  Quality assessment in intensive care units: proposal for a scoring system in terms of structure and process.

Authors:  Josette Najjar-Pellet; Olivier Jonquet; Patrick Jambou; Jacques Fabry
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: When to hold the breath?

Authors:  Anirban H Choudhuri
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2013-07

5.  Implementation of infection control best practice in intensive care units throughout Europe: a mixed-method evaluation study.

Authors:  Hugo Sax; Lauren Clack; Sylvie Touveneau; Fabricio da Liberdade Jantarada; Didier Pittet; Walter Zingg
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.