Literature DB >> 1540468

Infection control in intensive care units: U.K. national survey.

T J Inglis1, L J Sproat, P M Hawkey, P Knappett.   

Abstract

A completed questionnaire was returned by 246 (85%) intensive care units participating in a national survey of infection control practice in intensive care. Thirty-three units had no provision for isolating patients in single side wards. Sixty percent of responding ICU had fewer than one washbasin per bedspace. Several units reported using ventilator filters or tubing more frequently than is currently recommended. Excessive numbers of catheter urine specimens were sent for laboratory examination by some units. A small number of units used open urinary drainage systems. A significant proportion of ICU had no formally recognized policy on the management of intravascular cannulae. Only 8% of ICU in the U.K. were using a selective decontamination regimen, and nine of these (50%) had no full time consultant microbiologist available to supervise the recommended microbiological management. The majority of ICU received a regular visit (greater than or equal to one per week) from a microbiologist. Proposals are made on the development of a specialized infection control service in order to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection in intensive care, and to improve on existing resource management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1540468     DOI: 10.1093/bja/68.2.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  2 in total

1.  Infection control practices in intensive care units of 14 European countries. The EURO.NIS Study Group.

Authors:  M L Moro; O B Jepsen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Infection control and prevention strategies in the ICU.

Authors:  A F Widmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.