Literature DB >> 8904437

U.S. hospital mycobacteriology laboratories: status and comparison with state public health department laboratories.

J I Tokars1, J R Rudnick, K Kroc, L Manangan, G Pugliese, R E Huebner, J Chan, W R Jarvis.   

Abstract

In response to the resurgence of tuberculosis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the use of certain mycobacteriology laboratory methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and/or minimize times to complete specimen processing. A study to determine the extent to which these recommended methods were being used in hospital laboratories was needed. In 1992, a survey was mailed to infection control and laboratory personnel at 1,076 hospitals with > or = 100 beds to determine the mycobacterial laboratory services being performed, the methods being used, the number of specimens being processed, and the times to completion during 1991. In 1995, a 20% sample of hospital laboratories that responded to the initial questionnaire was resurveyed. Responses to the 1992 survey were received from personnel at 756 (70%) hospitals representing 750 laboratories. Among laboratories performing the services, the use of recommended methods was as follows: fluorochrome stain for acid-fast bacillus microscopy (47%); radiometric methods for primary culture (29%); rapid (radiometric methods, use of nucleic acid probes, high-performance liquid chromatography, or gas-liquid chromatography) methods for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (59%); and radiometric methods for drug susceptibility testing (55%). Reported times to complete specimen processing were shortest for laboratories that used recommended methods and longest for hospitals that referred specimens to outside laboratories. Only 46% of surveyed laboratories performed at least the minimal number of mycobacterial cultures (20/week) deemed necessary to maintain competence. Among 145 laboratories that performed the services and were resurveyed in 1995, use of recommended techniques increased from 44 to 73% for acid-fast bacillus microscopy, from 27 to 37% for primary culture, from 59 to 88% for M. tuberculosis identification, and from 55 to 75% for drug susceptibility testing. These changes were associated with reductions in reported specimen turnaround times. Use of the methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased at the resurveyed hospital mycobacteriology laboratories between 1991 and 1995. However, continued efforts are needed to increase the use of recommended methods at moderate- and high-volume laboratories, encourage referral of specimens from low-volume laboratories, and transmit results rapidly from all laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8904437      PMCID: PMC228869          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.680-685.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Nosocomial transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of health care workers in outbreak propagation.

Authors:  S Zaza; H M Blumberg; C Beck-Sagué; W H Haas; C L Woodley; M Pineda; C Parrish; J T Crawford; J E McGowan; W R Jarvis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready?

Authors:  F C Tenover; J T Crawford; R E Huebner; L J Geiter; C R Horsburgh; R C Good
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Current practices in mycobacteriology: results of a survey of state public health laboratories.

Authors:  R E Huebner; R C Good; J I Tokars
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  W R Jarvis
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Current status of mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories. Results of a questionnaire completed by participants in the College of American Pathologists Mycobacteriology E survey.

Authors:  G L Woods; F G Witebsky
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories that participate in the College of American Pathologists' Mycobacteriology E survey: results of a 1993 questionnaire.

Authors:  G L Woods; F G Witebsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States, 1985 through 1992.

Authors:  M F Cantwell; D E Snider; G M Cauthen; I M Onorato
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  An outbreak of tuberculosis with accelerated progression among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. An analysis using restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms.

Authors:  C L Daley; P M Small; G F Schecter; G K Schoolnik; R A McAdam; W R Jacobs; P C Hopewell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Role of solid media when used in conjunction with the BACTEC system for mycobacterial isolation and identification.

Authors:  C E Stager; J P Libonati; S H Siddiqi; J R Davis; N M Hooper; J F Baker; M E Carter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Use of recommended laboratory testing methods among patients with tuberculosis in California.

Authors:  S Kellam; L Pascopella; E Desmond; A Reingold; D P Chin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems.

Authors:  D Rebecca Prevots; Pamela A Shaw; Daniel Strickland; Lisa A Jackson; Marsha A Raebel; Mary Ann Blosky; Ruben Montes de Oca; Yvonne R Shea; Amy E Seitz; Steven M Holland; Kenneth N Olivier
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Turnaround times for mycobacterial cultures.

Authors:  B A Styrt; T M Shinnick; J C Ridderhof; J T Crawford; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Trends in Testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex From US Public Health Laboratories, 2009-2013.

Authors:  Frances Tyrrell; Cortney Stafford; Mitchell Yakrus; Monica Youngblood; Andrew Hill; Stephanie Johnston
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Descriptive profile of tuberculin skin testing programs and laboratory-acquired tuberculosis infections in public health laboratories.

Authors:  A S Kao; D A Ashford; M M McNeil; N G Warren; R C Good
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Role of the clinical mycobacteriology laboratory in diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in low-prevalence settings.

Authors:  Nicole M Parrish; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of an automated Q-beta replicase amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinical trial.

Authors:  J H Smith; G Radcliffe; S Rigby; D Mahan; D J Lane; J D Klinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Increased sensitivity of the BACTEC 460 mycobacterial radiometric broth culture system does not decrease the number of respiratory specimens required for a definitive diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  J D Harvell; W K Hadley; V L Ng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  False-positive Gen-Probe direct Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplification test results for patients with pulmonary M. kansasii and M. avium infections.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J R Salinas; R Paxson; K Magnon; J E Patterson; T F Patterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.