Literature DB >> 7714200

Mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories that participate in the College of American Pathologists' Mycobacteriology E survey: results of a 1993 questionnaire.

G L Woods1, F G Witebsky.   

Abstract

Participants in the College of American Pathologists' Mycobacteriology E proficiency testing survey in 1993 were asked to complete a questionnaire addressing mycobacterial test methods, test volume, and frequency of detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). A similar questionnaire had been distributed in 1992. The population responding to the 1993 questionnaire changed, because of a shift of small hospitals to the limited Mycobacteriology E1 survey, and the format of some questions was altered, so a direct comparison of 1992 and 1993 responses was not always possible. Among participants who answered the questions in both years, there was a significant increase in the use of the fluorochrome stain (57% in 1992, 61% in 1993), BACTEC TB for culture (34% in 1992, 38% in 1993) and susceptibility testing (51% in 1992, 61% in 1993), and DNA probes for identification (30% in 1992, 51% in 1993). The percentage of participants who processed respiratory specimens at least seven times per week increased from 9% in 1992 to 13% in 1993, and the percentage processing five times per week increased from 68 to 72%. The percentage of respondents who reported an identification of MTB within 21 days of specimen receipts and susceptibility test results within 28 days in 1992 and 1993 increased from 30 to 41% and from 12 to 19%, respectively. In regard to resistant MTB, 177 institutions in 1991 and 291 in 1992 reported resistance to isoniazid, and 114 in 1991 and 187 in 1992 reported resistance to both isoniazid and rifampin. Laboratorians are to be applauded for using the more rapid mycobacterial testing methods; however, given that tuberculosis remains a problem, this trend must continue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714200      PMCID: PMC227957          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.407-412.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready?

Authors:  F C Tenover; J T Crawford; R E Huebner; L J Geiter; C R Horsburgh; R C Good
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Current practices in mycobacteriology: results of a survey of state public health laboratories.

Authors:  R E Huebner; R C Good; J I Tokars
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  College of American Pathologists position statement regarding rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  J P Anhalt; F G Witebsky; G L Woods
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis caused by multiple-drug-resistant bacilli.

Authors:  M A Fischl; G L Daikos; R B Uttamchandani; R B Poblete; J N Moreno; R R Reyes; A M Boota; L M Thompson; T J Cleary; S A Oldham
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Current status of mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories. Results of a questionnaire completed by participants in the College of American Pathologists Mycobacteriology E survey.

Authors:  G L Woods; F G Witebsky
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  B R Edlin; J I Tokars; M H Grieco; J T Crawford; J Williams; E M Sordillo; K R Ong; J O Kilburn; S W Dooley; K G Castro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  U.S. hospital mycobacteriology laboratories: status and comparison with state public health department laboratories.

Authors:  J I Tokars; J R Rudnick; K Kroc; L Manangan; G Pugliese; R E Huebner; J Chan; W R Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prospective clinical evaluation of Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR test as a screening method in a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  R Cartuyvels; C De Ridder; S Jonckheere; L Verbist; J Van Eldere
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Turnaround times for mycobacterial cultures.

Authors:  B A Styrt; T M Shinnick; J C Ridderhof; J T Crawford; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, Septi-Chek AFB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for detection of mycobacteria.

Authors:  A J van Griethuysen; A R Jansz; A G Buiting
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Sensitivity of fluorochrome microscopy for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis versus nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Authors:  P W Wright; R J Wallace; N W Wright; B A Brown; D E Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of direct and concentrated acid-fast smears to identify specimens culture positive for Mycobacterium spp.

Authors:  E M Peterson; A Nakasone; J M Platon-DeLeon; Y Jang; L M de La Maza; E Desmond
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Contrast of survey results between state and a cohort of nonstate mycobacteriology laboratories: changes in laboratory practices.

Authors:  M M Denniston; B R Bird; K A Kelley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.