Literature DB >> 8903121

The meaning of 6.8: numeracy and normality in health information talks.

V Adelswärd1, L Sachs.   

Abstract

The ambiguities of risk which stem from its translation from epidemiological findings into clinical knowledge and practice and thus to lay experiences of health and illness is a clear dilemma. How are risks expressed statistically, or otherwise mathematically, to be interpreted and communicated within the discourse of medico-science, and how within the discourse of an individual's everyday life? An important tool in all risk discourses and in preventive practices such as health information is testing and test results. Test results--presented in mathematical terms as points on a scale, or as a number--are in fact fundamental to preventive practice. But what do we know about how people involved in these tests understand them and how the results are used in the construction of ideas about risk and normalcy? This article attempts to answer part of that question by drawing on an empirical study of the use of numbers as metaphors in talks between a nurse and her potential patients in a directed health survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8903121     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00366-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  The meaning and the measure of health literacy.

Authors:  David W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Putting the pieces together: endometriosis blogs, cognitive authority, and collaborative information behavior.

Authors:  Diane M Neal; Pamela J McKenzie
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Is there a pathology of prevention? The implications of visualizing the invisible in screening programs.

Authors:  L Sachs
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1995-12

5.  A community-based participatory approach to personalized, computer-generated nutrition feedback reports: the healthy environments partnership.

Authors:  Srimathi Kannan; Amy Schulz; Barbara Israel; Indira Ayra; Sheryl Weir; Timothy J Dvonch; Zachary Rowe; Patricia Miller; Alison Benjamin
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2008

6.  Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Thomas C Lehman; Holly Massett; Simon J C Lee; William M P Klein; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Perceived symptoms in people living with impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Susanne Andersson; Inger Ekman; Ulf Lindblad; Febe Friberg
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-12

Review 8.  The impact of health literacy on cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Richard S Safeer; Catherine E Cooke; Jann Keenan
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

9.  Biomarkers, the molecular gaze and the transformation of cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Kirsten Bell
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2013-06

10.  Women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in the UK breast cancer screening programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Elaine Douglas; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.