Literature DB >> 8901379

Comparison of two methods of calculating quality-adjusted life years.

T G Ganiats1, D K Browner, R M Kaplan.   

Abstract

This paper compares two methods for calculating QALYs using quality of life data from a clinical trial. The methods produced similar results in the population as a whole, but they gave different results in a large subset. Different methods for calculating QALYs may give different results, and care should be taken to select the correct method.

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8901379     DOI： 10.1007/bf00435981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Quality of Well-Being scale and Functional Status Index in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  T G Ganiats; L A Palinkas; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The healthy-years equivalents: how to measure them using the standard gamble approach.

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Public-health rounds at the Harvard School of Public Health. Allocation of resources to manage hypertension.

Authors:  W B Stason; M C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Design of a multicenter randomized trial for the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.914
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in HIV Clinics.

Authors:  Jacob T Painter; John C Fortney; Allen L Gifford; David Rimland; Thomas Monson; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Jeffrey M Pyne
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Cost-effectiveness of a primary care depression intervention.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Pyne; Kathryn M Rost; Mingliang Zhang; D Keith Williams; Jeffrey Smith; John Fortney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in the conservative treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistula after surgery: a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, phase III study (NUTRILEAK study).

Authors:  Caroline Gronnier; Cécile Chambrier; Alain Duhamel; Benoît Dervaux; Denis Collet; Delphine Vaudoyer; Jean-Marc Régimbeau; Jacques Jougon; Jérémie Théréaux; Gil Lebreton; Julie Veziant; Alain Valverde; Pablo Ortega-Deballon; François Pattou; Muriel Mathonnet; Julie Perinel; Laura Beyer-Berjot; David Fuks; Philippe Rouanet; Jérémie H Lefevre; Pierre Cattan; Sophie Deguelte; Bernard Meunier; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Patrick Pessaux; Nicolas Carrere; Ephrem Salame; Eleonor Benaim; Bertrand Dousset; Simon Msika; Christophe Mariette; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.279
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.