J R Ledsome1, C Cole, J M Sharp-Kehl. 1. Department of Physiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jledsome@unixg.ubc.ca
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of moderate hypoxia and hypocapnia on the latency and amplitude of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in conscious human subjects. METHODS: In ten volunteers the amplitude and latency of the cortical somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded during stimulation of the left posterior tibial nerve. Measurements of SSEPs and respiratory variables were made breathing ambient air, air containing a reduced oxygen percentage (17% O2, 14% O2 (n = 6) or 11% O2 (n = 10)), and again during voluntary hyperventilation breathing ambient air (PETCO2 = 20 mmHg, n = 10). RESULTS: Hypoxia (11% O2) caused mild stimulation of ventilation (P < 0.05) but had no effects on the latency or amplitude of the SSEP. Lesser degrees of hypoxia had no effects. Hyperventilation caused a small (2-4%) decrease) in the latency of the SSEP and an increase in the amplitude of the SSEP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings in conscious subjects were consistent with previous observations in anaesthetized humans and anaesthetized dogs and show that the decrease in latency of the SSEP associated with hypocapnia is not due to changes in the depth of anaesthesia. These effects of hypocapnia may contribute to small variations in the latency of the SSEP when monitoring is performed during surgery, but are unlikely to be large enough to be of clinical concern.
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of moderate hypoxia and hypocapnia on the latency and amplitude of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in conscious human subjects. METHODS: In ten volunteers the amplitude and latency of the cortical somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded during stimulation of the left posterior tibial nerve. Measurements of SSEPs and respiratory variables were made breathing ambient air, air containing a reduced oxygen percentage (17% O2, 14% O2 (n = 6) or 11% O2 (n = 10)), and again during voluntary hyperventilation breathing ambient air (PETCO2 = 20 mmHg, n = 10). RESULTS:Hypoxia (11% O2) caused mild stimulation of ventilation (P < 0.05) but had no effects on the latency or amplitude of the SSEP. Lesser degrees of hypoxia had no effects. Hyperventilation caused a small (2-4%) decrease) in the latency of the SSEP and an increase in the amplitude of the SSEP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings in conscious subjects were consistent with previous observations in anaesthetized humans and anaesthetized dogs and show that the decrease in latency of the SSEP associated with hypocapnia is not due to changes in the depth of anaesthesia. These effects of hypocapnia may contribute to small variations in the latency of the SSEP when monitoring is performed during surgery, but are unlikely to be large enough to be of clinical concern.