Literature DB >> 25673905

Effects of isoflurane on somatosensory-evoked potentials in calves: a pilot study.

Geoffrey Truchetti1, Patrick Burns1, Sylvain Nichols1, Joane Parent1.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) are used to monitor sensory function and are often recorded under general anesthesia. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of isoflurane on SSEPs in calves as it has not been reported. Eight calves (mean age: 40 days), were included in the study. Calves were anesthetized with a randomized sequence of four different isoflurane partial pressures. Blood gas analysis was performed before each measurement. SSEP were induced by repeated stimulation of the common dorsal digital nerve III. SSEPs were recorded from the lumbo-sacral junction (s-SSEP) and the head (c-SSEP). Latency and inter-amplitude of each peak were measured. For s-SSEP: One negative (Nsp1) and two positive (Psp1 and Psp2) peaks were identified in all tracings except for two calves. There was a significant effect of isoflurane on the latency of Psp2 (P = 0.01). Inter-amplitude decreased significantly with PaO2, PaCO2 and temperature (P < 0.05). Psp2 latency decreased with PaO2 (P = 0.01). For c-SSEP: two positive (Pc1 and Pc2) and two negative (Nc1 and Nc2) peaks were identified. There were identifiable peaks for the analysis of Pc1 latencies only. There was a significant positive linear relation between end-tidal isoflurane partial pressure (ETiso) and Pc1 latency (P = 0.04). None of the co-variables had a significant effect on the latency of Pc1 (P > 0.1). Isoflurane has a major impact on the recording of c-SSEP. Recording should be done at the lowest ETiso as possible, and anesthesia parameters should be kept constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673905      PMCID: PMC4283230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  24 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials: implications for perioperative monitoring.

Authors:  Mark Banoub; John E Tetzlaff; Armin Schubert
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Effect of epidural ropivacaine on somatosensory and motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Xenia Souvatzis; Helen Askitopoulou; Pavlos Katonis
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.452

Review 3.  Mechanisms of signal change during intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Masud Seyal; Brendan Mull
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Effects of hypocapnia on canine spinal, subcortical, and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials during isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  M A Gravenstein; F Sasse; K Hogan
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-04

5.  The effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Zhengyong Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Effects of hypothermia on short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  O N Markand; C Warren; G S Mallik; R D King; J W Brown; Y Mahomed
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

7.  Epidural analgesia after scoliosis surgery: electrophysiologic and clinical assessment of the effects of bupivacaine 0.125% plus morphine versus ropivacaine 0.2% plus morphine.

Authors:  Charles Pham Dang; Joël Delécrin; Yann Péréon; Isabelle Falconi; Norbert Passuti; Myriam Malinge; Michel Pinaud
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Neurons in the ventral spinal cord are more depressed by isoflurane, halothane, and propofol than are neurons in the dorsal spinal cord.

Authors:  JongBun Kim; Aubrey Yao; Richard Atherley; Earl Carstens; Steven L Jinks; Joseph F Antognini
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The effects of isoflurane on conditioned inhibition by dorsal column stimulation.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tobita; Manabu Okamoto; Miyako Shimizu; Tomohiro Yamakura; Hideyoshi Fujihara; Koki Shimoji; Hiroshi Baba
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in cows.

Authors:  G M Strain; A E Kraus-Hansen; B L Tedford; M S Claxton-Gill
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.