Literature DB >> 8895636

Proprioception after unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.

S Simmons1, S Lephart, H Rubash, G W Pifer, R Barrack.   

Abstract

Proprioception was measured in 2 groups of patients after successful knee arthroplasty. Twenty-eight patients had total knee arthroplasty and their results were compared with an age matched group of 10 subjects who had undergone unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The threshold to detection of passive motion was quantified as a measure of proprioception. The degree of preoperative arthritis was objectively classified according to Resnick. The anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament were present and preserved in all the patients who had undergone unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The anterior cruciate ligament was sacrificed and posterior cruciate ligament retained in 15 of the patients who had total knee arthroplasty and the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament were sacrificed in 13 of the patients who had total knee arthroplasties. There was no difference in threshold to detection of passive motion among any of the 3 groups. Maintaining the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament did not impart improved proprioception in unicondylar knee arthroplasty nor did maintaining the posterior cruciate ligament impart improved proprioception in total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8895636     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is bicompartmental knee arthroplasty more favourable to knee muscle strength and physical performance compared to total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jun Young Chung; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Baropodometry on patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Notarnicola; G Maccagnano; A Fiore; A Spinarelli; L Montenegro; M Paoloni; F Pastore; S Tafuri; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-10-03

4.  No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Ju-Kwon Park; Chan-Hee Park; Min-Cheol Kim; Pranav R Agrawal; Jong Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Implant with a mobile or a fixed bearing in unicompartmental knee joint replacemen].

Authors:  G Matziolis; S Tohtz; B Gengenbach; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The utility of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Feroz A Osmani; Savyasachi C Thakkar; Kristopher Collins; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-12-27

7.  The effects of total knee arthroplasty on knee proprioception of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ya-Yue Xue; Jing-Nan Shi; Kuan Zhang; Hao-Hua Zhang; Song-Hua Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.