Literature DB >> 8895027

Homophobia? No, homoprejudice.

C R Logan1.   

Abstract

The ubiquitous expression of anti-homosexual responses and the lack of consensus regarding the characterization of such responses served as the impetus for this study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of anti-homosexual responses as reported by male and female undergraduates. Participants in the study were asked to respond to both a lesbian and a gay target questionnaire. Responses were measured as either phobic or prejudicial. Findings indicated that there is little, if any, evidence to support the characterization of anti-homosexual responses as a phobia. Responses to prejudicial items suggested that anti-homosexual responses lie primarily within the realm of prejudice. Results also indicated that males were less tolerant than females of gays and lesbians and males and females respond differentially according to same-sex target. The implications of using a more accurate term such as "homoprejudice" to characterize anti-homosexual responses are discussed. Additionally, avenues for future research are addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8895027     DOI: 10.1300/J082v31n03_03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Homosex        ISSN: 0091-8369


  2 in total

1.  Preparing for rectal microbicides: sociocultural factors affecting product uptake among potential South American users.

Authors:  Jerome T Galea; Janni J Kinsler; John Imrie; César R Nureña; Lucía Ruiz; Luis Fernando Galarza; Jorge Sánchez; William E Cunningham
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Kenyan MSM: no longer a hidden population.

Authors:  Eduard J Sanders; Harold Jaffe; Helgar Musyoki; Nicolas Muraguri; Susan M Graham
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.177

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.