Literature DB >> 8894935

Electrocardiographic patterns and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of clockwise type I atrial flutter.

N Saoudi1, M Nair, A Abdelazziz, H Poty, A Daou, F Anselme, B Letac.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Counterclockwise right atrial propagation is usually observed in common atrial flutter, but little is known regarding flutter with clockwise right atrial rotation. The aim of this study is to describe the ECG characteristics and results of catheter ablation of atrial flutter with clockwise right atrial rotation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Among the 38 patients with type I atrial flutter in this study population, right atrial impulse propagation was counterclockwise in 20 and clockwise in 8. In the remaining 10 patients, both clockwise and counterclockwise patterns were seen. Clinical and ECG parameters associated with clockwise flutter were compared to those of 28 cases of counterclockwise atrial flutter. Ablation was performed in 11 of 18 cases using a technique identical to that used for counterclockwise flutter. A classical "sawtooth" pattern of the flutter wave was observed in 28 of 28 counterclockwise and 14 of 18 clockwise flutter. A shorter plateau phase, a widening of the negative component of the F wave in the inferior leads, and a negative F wave in V1 were the most consistent findings in clockwise flutter. Coronary sinus recording always showed septal to lateral left atrial impulse propagation. Ablation was successful in 11 of 11 cases of clockwise flutter in whom this procedure was performed, with 9.5 +/- 11.6 radiofrequency pulses delivered between the tricuspid valve and the coronary sinus ostium (n = 5) or the inferior vena cava (n = 5), and in the proximal coronary sinus (n = 1). After a follow-up of 46.6 weeks, two recurrences of clockwise flutter were encountered, which were successfully treated with a second session.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to commonly accepted concepts, clockwise rotation of atrial flutter is not an infrequent phenomenon and can mimic counterclockwise rotation. It can also be successfully ablated by radiofrequency pulses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8894935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  16 in total

1.  [Guidelines for catheter ablation].

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kuck; Sabine Ernst; Uwe Dorwarth; Ellen Hoffmann; Heinz Pitschner; Jürgen Tebbenjohanns; Hans Kottkamp
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Mechanisms of atypical flutter wave morphology in patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Authors:  Su-Hua Yan; Wen-Juan Cheng; Le-Xin Wang; Ming-You Chen; He-Sheng Hu; Mei Xue
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus is a critical site of unidirectional block during the induction of common atrial flutter.

Authors:  H Poty; F Anselme; N Saoudi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  New insights into typical atrial flutter ablation: extra-isthmus activation time on the flutter wave is predictive of extra-isthmus conduction time after isthmus block.

Authors:  Decebal Gabriel Latcu; Sok-Sithikun Bun; Mathieu Arnoult; Philippe Ricard; Jean-Paul Rinaldi; Nadir Saoudi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Randomized controlled trial of Amigo® robotically controlled versus manually controlled ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus using a contact force ablation catheter.

Authors:  Kurt S Hoffmayer; Felix Krainski; Sanjay Shah; Jessica Hunter; Maylene Alegre; Jonathan C Hsu; Gregory K Feld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Predictors of unusual ECG characteristics in cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Kurt S Hoffmayer; Yanfei Yang; Stephen Joseph; James M McCabe; Prashant Bhave; Jonathan Hsu; Ramford K Ng; Byron K Lee; Nitish Badhwar; Randall J Lee; Zian H Tseng; Jeffrey E Olgin; Sanjiv M Narayan; Gregory M Marcus; Melvin M Scheinman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 7.  Thinking outside the Box: Rotor Modulation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ruchir Sehra; Sanjiv M Narayan; John Hummel
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

8.  Electrophysiologic characteristics of a dilated atrium in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Authors:  Y J Chen; S A Chen; C T Tai; W C Yu; A N Feng; Y A Ding; M S Chang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Relationship between polarity of the flutter wave in the surface ECG and endocardial atrial activation sequence in patients with typical counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter.

Authors:  Naohiro Oshikawa; Ichiro Watanabe; Riko Masaki; Yasuo Okumura; Kimie Okubo; Hidezou Sugimura; Toshiaki Kojima; Satoshi Saito; Yukio Ozawa; Katsuo Kanmatsuse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter: correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  L P Lai; J L Lin; L J Lin; W J Chen; Y L Ho; Y Z Tseng; C H Chen; Y T Lee; W P Lien; S K Huang
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.