Literature DB >> 8894932

Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine.

S McGill1, D Juker, P Kropf.   

Abstract

This study tested the possibility of obtaining the activity of deeper muscles in the torso-specifically psoas, quadratus lumborum, external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdominis, using surface myoelectric electrodes. It was hypothesized that: (1) surface electrodes adequately represent the amplitude of deep muscles (specifically psoas, quadratus lumborum, external oblique, internal oblique, transverse abdominis); (2) a single surface electrode location would best represent the activation profiles of each deep muscle over a broad variety of tasks. We assumed that prediction of activation within 10% of maximum voluntary contraction (RMS difference between the surface and intramuscular channels), over the time history of the signal, was reasonable and acceptable to assist clinical interpretation of muscle activation amplitude, and ultimately for modeled estimates of muscle force. Surface electrodes were applied and intramuscular electrodes were inserted on the left side of the body in five men and three women who then performed a wide variety of flexor tasks (bent knee and straight leg situps and leg raises, curl ups), extensor tasks (including lifting barbells up to 70 kg), lateral bending tasks (standing lateral bend and horizontal lying side support), twisting tasks (standing and sitting), and internal/external hip rotation. Using the criteria of RMS difference and the coefficient of determination (R2) to compare surface with intramuscular myoelectric signals, the results indicated that selected surface electrodes adequately represent the amplitude of deep muscles-always within 15% RMS difference, or less with the exception of psoas where differences up to 20% were observed but only in certain maximum voluntary contraction efforts. It appears reasonable for spine modelers, and particularly clinicians, to assume well selected surface electrode locations provide a representation of these deeper muscles-as long as they recognize the magnitude of error for their particular application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8894932     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  30 in total

1.  Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  An ultrasound investigation into the morphology of the human abdominal wall uncovers complex deformation patterns during contraction.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effect of double versus single oscillating exercise devices on trunk and limb muscle activation.

Authors:  Shruti Arora; Duane C Button; Fabien A Basset; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

4.  An unstable base alters limb and abdominal activation strategies during the flexionrelaxation response.

Authors:  David G Behm; Sonya M Burry; Gregory E D Greeley; Andrew C Poole; Scott N Mackinnon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Sex-specific abdominal activation strategies during landing.

Authors:  Anthony S Kulas; Randy J Schmitz; Sandra J Shultz; Jolene M Henning; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Active and passive contributions to joint kinetics during walking in older adults.

Authors:  Amy Silder; Bryan Heiderscheit; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of paraplegic gait with the assistance of mechanical orthosis and walker.

Authors:  Mina Baniasad; Farzam Farahmand; Mokhtar Arazpour; Hassan Zohoor
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Comparison of abdominal muscle activity during a single-legged hold in the hook-lying position on the floor and on a round foam roll.

Authors:  Su-Jung Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon; Chung-Hwi Yi; Hye-Seon Jeon; Jae-Seop Oh; Heon-Seock Cynn; Jong-Hyuck Weon
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  How is precision regulated in maintaining trunk posture?

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Load and speed effects on the cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Pialasse; Danik Lafond; Vincent Cantin; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.