Literature DB >> 8892553

Pre- and postoperative factors associated with return to work following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

A Herno1, O Airaksinen, T Saari, O Svomalainen.   

Abstract

Low back disorders are an increasingly common and costly health problem in Western countries. It has been recommended that the return to work of patients should be the most important outcome measure of medical care. The aim of this study was to compare women's and men's working capacity after lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) operations and to identify the factors related to it. The subjects of this study were 185 women (mean age 54 years, mean follow-up time 4.2 years) and 254 men (mean age 52 years, mean follow-up time 4.3 years). After the operation, 37% of the women and 41% of the men returned to work. None of the patients who had retired before the operation returned to work afterward. The variables that predicted postoperative ability to work for women were: being fit to work at the time of operation, age < 50 years at the time of operation, and duration of LSS symptoms < 2 years. For men, these variables were: being fit to work at the time of operation, age < 50 years at the time of operation, no prior surgery, and the extent of the surgical procedure equal to or less than 1 laminectomy. Women's and men's working capacity do not differ after LSS operation. If the aim is to maximize working capacity, then, when an LSS operation is indicated, it should be performed without delay. In LSS patients who are > 50 years old and on sick leave, it is unrealistic to expect that they will return to work. Therefore, after such an extensive surgical procedure, re-education of patients for lighter jobs could improve the chances of these patients returning to work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8892553     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<473::AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  6 in total

1.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Gender differences as an influence on patients' satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Yoram Folman; Zeev Arinzon; Abraham Adunsky; Amiram Catz; Reuven Gepstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Ville Leinonen; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Tapani Saari; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Accuracy and reproducibility of a retrospective outcome assessment for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Pekka Kuittinen; Timo Juhani Aalto; Tapani Heikkilä; Ville Leinonen; Sakari Savolainen; Petri Sipola; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Patterns of physical activity and exercise after lumbar surgery among Japanese patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Daisuke Higuchi; Yu Kondo; Takahiro Miki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2021-02-13

6.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Return to Work after Surgery for Spinal Meningioma: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jenny Pettersson-Segerlind; Ann-Christin von Vogelsang; Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Charles Tatter; Tiit Mathiesen; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.