Literature DB >> 8892221

Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts.

M E Ladd1, P Erhart, J F Debatin, B J Romanowski, P Boesiger, G C McKinnon.   

Abstract

Understanding the appearance of thin metallic structures in magnetic resonance imaging is important for evaluating the potential role of MRI in guiding and monitoring percutaneous interventions. As most MR compatible instruments are made from materials with a susceptibility different from water, their visibility is enhanced beyond what is expected on the grounds of displaced water alone. Unfortunately, this artifactually enhanced visibility is not constant, but instead depends on a variety of factors. This article presents computer simulations of the image distortion resulting from magnetic susceptibility differences between a needle and the surrounding tissue. The simulations show not only an artifact size that is dependent on needle composition, orientation, and pulse sequence, but also a corresponding shift of the artifact center away from the actual center of the needle. These effects place limits on the accuracy of MRI-guided needle tip placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8892221     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910360423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  15 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artefacts.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Sönke Langner; Katrin Hegenscheid; Matthias Evert; Antje Kickhefel; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MRI-guided vascular access with an active visualization needle.

Authors:  Christina E Saikus; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Israel M Barbash; Jessica H Colyer; Ozgur Kocaturk; Anthony Z Faranesh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Numerical simulations of intra-voxel dephasing effects and signal voids in gradient echo MR imaging using different sub-grid sizes.

Authors:  Bernd M Müller-Bierl; Hansjörg Graf; Philippe L Pereira; Fritz Schick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system.

Authors:  Joerg Stattaus; Stefan Maderwald; Hideo A Baba; Guido Gerken; Joerg Barkhausen; Michael Forsting; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MR-guided biopsies with a newly designed cordless coil in an open low-field system: initial findings.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Theodor Vetter; Frank Huebner; Montu Tuwari; Florian Mayer; Katrin Eichler; M-L Hansmann; A Wetter; C Herzog; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Reduced k-space acquisition to accelerate MR imaging of moving interventional instruments: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jens Christian Rump; Martin Jonczyk; Christian Jürgen Seebauer; Florian Streitparth; Felix Victor Güttler; Ulf Karl-Martin Teichgräber; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Radial MRI with variable echo times: reducing the orientation dependency of susceptibility artifacts of an MR-safe guidewire.

Authors:  Katharina E Schleicher; Michael Bock; Klaus Düring; Stefan Kroboth; Axel J Krafft
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Artifact-reduced imaging of biopsy needles with 2D multispectral imaging.

Authors:  Hans Weber; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MR-guided biopsies of lesions in the retroperitoneal space: technique and results.

Authors:  S Zangos; K Eichler; A Wetter; T Lehnert; R Hammerstingl; T Diebold; P Reichel; C Herzog; M-L Hansmann; M G Mack; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Wireless mobile technology to improve workflow and feasibility of MR-guided percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Martin A Rube; Andrew B Holbrook; Benjamin F Cox; Razvan Buciuc; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.