Literature DB >> 8888304

Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance.

W H Dittrich1, T Troscianko, S E Lea, D Morgan.   

Abstract

It is well known that biological motion, as produced by point-light displays on a human body, gives a good representation of the represented body-eg its gender and the nature of the task which it is engaged in. The question is whether it is possible to judge the emotional state of a human body from motion information alone. An ability to make this kind of judgment may imply that people are able to perceive emotion from patterns of movement without having to compute the detailed shape first. Subjects were shown brief video clips of two trained dancers (one male, one female). The dancers were aiming to convey the following emotions: fear, anger, grief, joy, surprise, and disgust. The video clips portrayed fully lit scenes and point-light scenes, with thirteen small points of light attached to the body of each dancer. Half the stimuli were presented the right way up, while half were inverted. The subjects' task was to judge which emotion was being portrayed. Full-body clips gave good recognition of emotionality (88% correct), but the results for upright biological-motion displays were also significantly above chance (63% correct). Inversion of the display reduced biological-motion (but not full-body) performance to close to chance but still significantly above chance. A space-time analysis of the motion of the points of light was carried out, and was related to the discriminability of the different emotions. Biological-motion displays, which convey no information while static, are able to give a rich description of the subject matter, including the ability to judge emotional state. This ability is disrupted when the image is inverted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888304     DOI: 10.1068/p250727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  96 in total

Review 1.  The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism.

Authors:  Ami Klin; Warren Jones; Robert Schultz; Fred Volkmar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Neural signatures of autism.

Authors:  Martha D Kaiser; Caitlin M Hudac; Sarah Shultz; Su Mei Lee; Celeste Cheung; Allison M Berken; Ben Deen; Naomi B Pitskel; Daniel R Sugrue; Avery C Voos; Celine A Saulnier; Pamela Ventola; Julie M Wolf; Ami Klin; Brent C Vander Wyk; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Common neural correlates of emotion perception in humans.

Authors:  Jan Jastorff; Yun-An Huang; Martin A Giese; Mathieu Vandenbulcke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Thinking in action: thought made visible in contemporary dance.

Authors:  Catherine Stevens; Shirley McKechnie
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-08-26

5.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

6.  Does the Level of Graphical Detail of a Virtual Handball Thrower Influence a Goalkeeper's Motor Response?

Authors:  Nicolas Vignais; Benoit Bideau; Cathy Craig; Sébastien Brault; Franck Multon; Paul Delamarche; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Social perception in autism spectrum disorders: impaired category selectivity for dynamic but not static images in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Shawn C Milleville; Lauren Kenworthy; Gregory L Wallace; Stephen J Gotts; Michael S Beauchamp; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation.

Authors:  Beatriz Calvo-Merino; Shantel Ehrenberg; Delia Leung; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-25

9.  Emotion and the processing of symbolic gestures: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Tobias Flaisch; Frank Häcker; Britta Renner; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Perceiving emotion: towards a realistic understanding of the task.

Authors:  Roddy Cowie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.