Literature DB >> 8887844

Role of prenatal care in preterm birth and low birthweight in Portugal.

H Barros1, M Tavares, T Rodrigues.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear if benefits of prenatal care can be attributed to the amount and content of care or to uncontrolled risk factors that might also affect its use. This study was designed to evaluate the independent association between prenatal care adequacy and adverse pregnancy outcomes, measured either as the occurrence of preterm birth or low birthweight.
METHOD: We studied 3734 single liveborn infants. Information on mothers' use of prenatal care, and demographic, anthropometric, behavioural, clinical and obstetric characteristics were obtained through questionnaire. Prenatal care was classified as inadequate, intermediate or adequate based on Kessner's Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index. To estimate the association of adequacy of prenatal care and the defined outcomes, both crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent CI) were calculated by means of unconditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: Adequate and intermediate (compared with inadequate) prenatal care was significantly associated with a lower risk of preterm (OR = 0.20, 95 per cent CI 0.12-0.32, and OR = 0.35, 95 per cent CI 0.23-0.54, respectively) or low birthweight (OR = 0.23, 95 per cent CI 0.15-0.35, and OR = 0.31, 95 per cent CI 0.20-0.46, respectively). After adjusting for maternal age, social class, marital status, complications of pregnancy and type of hospital, the risk of preterm delivery remained significantly lower for women receiving adequate (OR = 0.18, 95 per cent CI 0.11-0.28) or intermediate care (OR = 0.35, 95 per cent CI 0.23-0.54). Adjusted for maternal body mass index, marital status, cigarette smoking, pregnancy weight gain and complications, type of hospital, newborn sex and gestational age, a significant decreased risk of low birthweight remained for infants of women with adequate (OR = 0.39, 95 per cent CI 0.23-0.65) or intermediate care (OR = 0.47, 95 per cent CI 0.29-0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that in a population with free access to prenatal care, the quantitative adequacy of prenatal care has an independent effect on pregnancy outcome, whether assessed through the occurrence of preterm births or low birthweight infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8887844     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  19 in total

1.  Trends in prenatal care use and low birthweight in southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Z Goldani; Marco A Barbieri; Antonio A M Silva; Heloisa Bettiol
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Migrant women's utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Heaman; H Bayrampour; D Kingston; B Blondel; M Gissler; C Roth; S Alexander; A Gagnon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

3.  A case-control study of preterm delivery risk factors according to clinical subtypes and severity.

Authors:  Marisa Ip; Elmera Peyman; Vitool Lohsoonthorn; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Comparison of risk factors for small-for-gestational-age and preterm in a Portuguese cohort of newborns.

Authors:  Teresa Rodrigues; Henrique Barros
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-03-07

5.  Disparities and barriers encountered by immigrant Dominican mothers accessing prenatal care services in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  J F Colón-Burgos; H M Colón-Jordan; V E Reyes-Ortiz; H A Marin-Centeno; R Rios-Mota
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

6.  Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Zhen Han; Sohail Mulla; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-20

8.  The development and application of a new tool to assess the adequacy of the content and timing of antenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Godelieve Masuy-Stroobant; Soo Downe; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Effect of Social Service Prenatal Care Utilization on Perinatal Outcomes among Women with Socioeconomic Problems in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area.

Authors:  Jun Kakogawa; Miyuki Sadatsuki; Yoko Ogaki; Misao Nakanishi; Shigeki Minoura
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-25

10.  The influences of Taiwan's National Health Insurance on women's choice of prenatal care facility: Investigation of differences between rural and non-rural areas.

Authors:  Likwang Chen; Chi-Liang Chen; Wei-Chih Yang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.