Literature DB >> 8885837

Furilisin: a variant of subtilisin BPN' engineered for cleaving tribasic substrates.

M D Ballinger1, J Tom, J A Wells.   

Abstract

The serine protease, subtilisin BPN', was engineered to cleave proteins after tribasic sequences in a manner that resembles the substrate specificity of furin, one of the mammalian subtilisin homologs that processes prohormones. As a starting point we used a double mutant of subtilisin BPN' (N62D/ G166D) that showed substantial preference for cleaving after sequences having consecutive dibasic residues (namely, at the P1 and P2 substrate positions) [Ballinger et al. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 13312-13319]. Additional specificity for basic residues was engineered at the P4 position by introducing subtilisin-to-furin substitutions at three hydrophobic residues that composed the S4 subsite (Y104, I107, and L126). Initial attempts to incorporate a Y104D or I107E mutation or the Y104D/I107E double mutation into the dibasic specific enzyme failed to generate the processed enzyme. The problem was traced to the inability of the mutant prosubtilisins to process themselves and fold correctly. Replacing the natural processing site sequence (AHAY) with a good furin substrate sequence (RHKR) resulted in expression of the triple subtilisin mutant (N62D/Y104D/G166D) we call "furilisin". Furilisin hydrolyzes synthetic tribasic substrates (succinyl-RAKR-pNA or succinyl-KAKR-pNA) with high catalytic efficiency (kcat/K(m) > 3 x 10(5) M-1 s-1) and discriminates in favor of Arg versus Ala at the P4 position by a factor of 360. The overall specificity change versus the wild-type enzyme was dramatic. For example, succinyl-RAKR-pNA was cleaved approximately 60000 times faster than succinyl-AAPF-pNA, a good substrate for wild-type subtilisin. Similarly, furilisin was inhibited (K1* = 29 nM) by a variant of the turkey ovomucoid third domain inhibitor that contained an engineered furin substrate site (RCKR decreases) [Lu et al. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14583-14585] and not by one having a good wild-type subtilisin substrate sequence (ACTL decreases). Interestingly, the extreme changes in substrate specificity resulted from substantial synergy between the engineered subsites. These studies provide a basic example of how to manipulate substrate specificity in a modular fashion, thereby creating an engineered-enzyme that may be useful as a protein processing tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8885837     DOI: 10.1021/bi961543h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  11 in total

1.  Construction and flow cytometric screening of targeted enzyme libraries.

Authors:  Navin Varadarajan; Jason R Cantor; George Georgiou; Brent L Iverson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Highly active and selective endopeptidases with programmed substrate specificities.

Authors:  Navin Varadarajan; Sarah Rodriguez; Bum-Yeol Hwang; George Georgiou; Brent L Iverson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  A genetic screen for the isolation and characterization of site-specific proteases.

Authors:  H J Sices; T M Kristie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Furin: a mammalian subtilisin/Kex2p-like endoprotease involved in processing of a wide variety of precursor proteins.

Authors:  K Nakayama
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Rational design of a scytalone dehydratase-like enzyme using a structurally homologous protein scaffold.

Authors:  A E Nixon; S M Firestine; F G Salinas; S J Benkovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Directed evolution of highly selective proteases by using a novel FACS-based screen that capitalizes on the p53 regulator MDM2.

Authors:  Tae Hyeon Yoo; Mark Pogson; Brent L Iverson; George Georgiou
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 7.  Engineering next generation proteases.

Authors:  Mark Pogson; George Georgiou; Brent L Iverson
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  Quantitative chimeric analysis of six specificity determinants that differentiate Escherichia coli aspartate from tyrosine aminotransferase.

Authors:  Wendy A Shaffer; Tinh N Luong; Steven C Rothman; Jack F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A remodelled protease that cleaves phosphotyrosine substrates.

Authors:  Zachary A Knight; Jennifer L Garrison; Karina Chan; David S King; Kevan M Shokat
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases.

Authors:  M B Rao; A M Tanksale; M S Ghatge; V V Deshpande
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.