Literature DB >> 8885659

Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear.

J J O'Connor1, J W Goodfellow.   

Abstract

This paper attributes the high rate of high-density polyethylene (HDP) wear in many knee prostheses to incongruity of their articular surfaces. The authors discuss the anatomical and kinematic features of the knee which have led most designers to choose incongruous surfaces and review the reasons for employing free bearings, analogues of the natural menisci, to provide congruity without restriction of movement. There are theoretical reasons against employing freely mobile bearing in the absence of a functioning anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the authors' experience has confirmed this limitation in practice. It is concluded that, in bicompartmental replacement, the movements of the meniscal bearing should be limited in the anteroposterior direction. For unicompartmental arthritis, an unconstrained bearing can be employed if, as is usually the case, all ligaments are intact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8885659     DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_415_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  18 in total

1.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Fixed versus mobile weight-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hamidreza Shemshaki; Mohammad Dehghani; Mohammad Amin Eshaghi; Mahboobe Fereidan Esfahani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Li; Qiang Wu; Guang-Zhi Ning; Shi-Qing Feng; Qiu-Li Wu; Yan Li; Yan Hao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement.

Authors:  M D Horwitz; S Awan; M B Chatoo; D J Stott; D P Powles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  One year after navigated total knee replacement, no clinically relevant difference found between fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacement in a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Karina E Bohlen; Ekkehard Hille; Sebastian P M Dries
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-05-27

7.  A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of Press Fit Condylar Rotating-Platform High-Flexion and Low Contact Stress Mobile Bearing Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short term Results.

Authors:  Shin Woo Nam; Yong Seuk Lee; Ji Hoon Kwak; Nam Ki Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-28

8.  Meniscal Bearing Dislocation of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Faint Symptom.

Authors:  Tadashi Fujii; Yoshio Matsui; Marehoshi Noboru; Yusuke Inagaki; Yoshinori Kadoya; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-06-07

9.  Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.

Authors:  Oystein Gothesen; Stein Hakon L Lygre; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen Graves; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.