Literature DB >> 8883989

Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE.

D L Fishman1, V L Stone, B A DiPaula.   

Abstract

This study compared the usefulness of various CD-ROM versions of International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and MEDLINE for pharmacy research. Journal coverage as well as the strengths and weaknesses of database structure and contents were considered. The journals indexed in each database were compared to those identified in a survey of the research journals most important to University of Maryland at Baltimore pharmacy faculty and in a similar North Carolina study rating pharmacy journals. In addition, indexed journals were checked against the Institute for Scientific Information's most recent list of high-impact journals in pharmacology and pharmacy. Searches representing a variety of topics relevant to pharmacy were conducted in both databases, and the number and relevance of citations located were analyzed. Results showed that IPA indexed a greater number of pharmacy titles, but that MEDLINE indexed more pharmacy journals designated in studies as significant to the field. There was little overlap in coverage between the two databases. MEDLINE produced larger retrievals for the majority of questions, but many citations retrieved in IPA did not appear in MEDLINE.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883989      PMCID: PMC226161     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  9 in total

1.  MEDLINE and PsycLIT on CD-ROM: a survey of users in an academic medical library.

Authors:  N S King; S E Goldstein; L A Williams
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  1990

2.  Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for the nurse researcher.

Authors:  J Burnham; B Shearer
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  1993

3.  The 21 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) online database: Food and Drug Administration regulations full-text.

Authors:  M S Bobka
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  1993

4.  SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces.

Authors:  D Schoonbaert
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1996-01

5.  Comparison of five information services as sources for bioavailability data.

Authors:  R J Cluxton; R H Hunter; R C Reed
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1979-09

6.  Online information retrieval in pharmacy and related fields.

Authors:  C A Perry
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1986-06

7.  Selecting CD-ROM databases for nursing students: a comparison of MEDLINE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL).

Authors:  E Okuma
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-01

8.  A comparison of CINAHL and MEDLINE CD-ROM in four allied health areas.

Authors:  M M Watson; R Perrin
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-04

9.  Online searching of the pharmaceutical literature.

Authors:  K W Kruse
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1983-02
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  A J Brettle; A F Long
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2001-10

2.  Evaluation of five full-text drug databases by pharmacy students, faculty, and librarians: do the groups agree?

Authors:  Natalie Kupferberg; Lynda Jones Hartel
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.