Literature DB >> 10132288

Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for the nurse researcher.

J Burnham1, B Shearer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10132288     DOI: 10.1300/j115v12n03_04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q        ISSN: 0276-3869


  4 in total

1.  Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Sandrine Sonié; Nirav R Shah; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Ralph A Gillies; Kathy Davies
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE.

Authors:  D L Fishman; V L Stone; B A DiPaula
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1996-07

4.  Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jean-François Gehanno; Laetitia Rollin; Stefan Darmoni
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.