Literature DB >> 8883828

Skilled forelimb movements in prey catching and in reaching by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and opossums (Monodelphis domestica): relations to anatomical differences in motor systems.

T L Ivanco1, S M Pellis, I Q Whishaw.   

Abstract

Traditional anatomical/behavioral classifications suggest that rats and opossums have simple motor systems and are impoverished with respect to their ability to make prehensile movements. Nevertheless, the motor system in rats and opossums represent extremes in relative size and complexity suggesting that a behavioral analysis of the movement competencies of these species will provide insights into the significance of such anatomical differences. This paper examines the movements that the two species use in catching crickets and in reaching for food items. Both species could use a single limb to reach out and grasp prey during prey catching and both could use a single limb to take food from a shelf. Both species could transport the food to the mouth by using a single paw. The food handling behavior of the rats was more complex than that of the opossums, however. They used a variety of prey catching movements and extensively manipulated the prey to remove the legs and wings before eating only the head and body. Additionally the rats made rotatory limb movements of aiming, pronation, and supination, when reaching. For both cricket catching and reaching, they used their digits more than did the opossums. The suggestion also emerged from the results that the movements of the opossums were more fixed and species-typical whereas those of the rats were more plastic and individualistic. Thus, the skilled movements of both species are more complex than is generally recognized and the greater complexity of the rat movements parallels their more complex motor system. These results are discussed in relation to anatomical differences in the motor system and, specifically, to differences in the terminal fields of the pyramidal tract. It is concluded that the motor abilities of nonprimate mammals have been vastly underrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883828     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00011-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does play shape hand use skill in rats?

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Candace J Burke; Sergio M Pellis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jenni M Karl; Nicholas K Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Do constraints associated with the locomotor habitat drive the evolution of forelimb shape? A case study in musteloid carnivorans.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Fabre; Raphael Cornette; Anjali Goswami; Stéphane Peigné
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  An electron microscopic examination of the corticospinal projection to the cervical spinal cord in the rat: lack of evidence for cortico-motoneuronal synapses.

Authors:  H-W Yang; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Behavioral differences between late preweanling and adult female Sprague-Dawley rat exploration of animate and inanimate stimuli and food.

Authors:  Kiersten S Smith; Joan I Morrell
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Rats' learning of a new motor skill: insight into the evolution of motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Linda Hermer-Vazquez; Nasim Moshtagh
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Absorption-mode Fourier transform mass spectrometry: the effects of apodization and phasing on modified protein spectra.

Authors:  Yulin Qi; Huilin Li; Rebecca H Wills; Pilar Perez-Hurtado; Xiang Yu; David P A Kilgour; Mark P Barrow; Cheng Lin; Peter B O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Photic preference of the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica).

Authors:  A M H Seelke; J C Dooley; L A Krubitzer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  The vermicelli handling test: a simple quantitative measure of dexterous forepaw function in rats.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; DeAnna L Adkins; Martin T Woodlee; Lincoln C Husbands; Mónica A Maldonado; Jacqueline R Kane; Timothy Schallert; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.